Now that we have two new team members with time to dedicate outside of engineering ( @2i2c-org/partnerships-and-community-guidance ), we should decide how to coordinate and organize our work items.
We should decide what kind of of system @2i2c-org/partnerships-and-community-guidance wishes to use for things like:
Tracking and shaping work items
Triaging and prioritizing work
Tracking planned and development work, as well as unplanned operational work and toil
Time-boxing and having checkpoints
Collaborating and communicating amongst team members
This might be as simple as "just do what we already do via our current team processes", but given that this team has significantly different kinds of deliverables / work items / etc, I feel that @jmunroe and @colliand should decide what works best for them. Either way, we should find ways to make sure this team remains connected to the @2i2c-org/tech-team.
cc also @damianavila - I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on this one as well since you are helping keep track of all the WIP in our backlog already.
Context
Now that we have two new team members with time to dedicate outside of engineering ( @2i2c-org/partnerships-and-community-guidance ), we should decide how to coordinate and organize our work items.
Our current coordination / planning workflow has been used in the @2i2c-org/tech-team for a while, and the "source of truth" for what we're working on is in the Team Backlog and stewarded / managed by @damianavila .
Proposal
We should decide what kind of of system @2i2c-org/partnerships-and-community-guidance wishes to use for things like:
This might be as simple as "just do what we already do via our current team processes", but given that this team has significantly different kinds of deliverables / work items / etc, I feel that @jmunroe and @colliand should decide what works best for them. Either way, we should find ways to make sure this team remains connected to the @2i2c-org/tech-team.
Updates and actions
No response