-
As commented here (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/96#issuecomment-727259580)
`Encrypt Wallet`: "Encrypt the wallet. The wallet will be encrypted with a passphrase of your choice." This i…
-
The `auxpow_mining.py` tests are failing.
**Expected behavior**
Functional tests should succeed.
**Actual behavior**
~~~
191/196 - auxpow_mining.py failed, Duration: 1 s
stdout:
2021-01…
-
Currently navcoin core shares with bitcoin the derivation path used for the generation of new addresses (m/0'/0'), this should be changed to m/44'/130' while preserving backwards compatibility with ol…
-
I have a 3n3 multisig wallet generated a long time ago. When I select wallet -> Details, I copy the public keys.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/30128845/140618926-15c5d7fa-9ca8-…
-
It seems Bitcoin Core + electrum changed the regtest bech32 prefix a while ago to 'bcrt1'. At the moment if you try paying to a P2WPKH or P2WSH address, on regtest, with a trezor, you get a cryptic 'F…
afk11 updated
5 years ago
-
User "Xeron" on #electrum IRC (on freenode) retrieved a bitcoin private key from an old (2010) wallet.dat using Bitcoin Core 0.14.2.
He then tried to sweep the coins from the privkey using Electrum 2…
-
See https://github.com/zcash/zcash/pull/2335#discussion_r114265818. We don't use it, and upstream Bitcoin Core doesn't use it.
str4d updated
4 years ago
-
## Introduction
The Bitcoin UX Research toolkit is a project built by the community and it …
-
Any ways to block some addresses from being spent like it's possible to do in electrum or in bitcoin core for transactions (RPC lockunspent)?
-
I'm experimenting with LndHub and a regtest bitcoin & lightning network powered by [polar](https://lightningpolar.com/).
Regtest addresses it turns out have [different prefix](https://bitcoin.stack…