-
Hi,
Thank you for releasing this awesome project!
I am interested in integrating whisperX into some open-source projects. I noticed that the license was BSD-4-Clause, is there any chance that could …
-
Module has a wrong SPDX identifier as the "license" field in "package.json".
According to [spdx list](https://spdx.org/licenses/) "BSD" is not a valid spdx identifier.
-
Nice code jawahars16 but unusable without LICENSE.TXT. You can add it easily:
Open your GitHub repository in a browser.
In the root directory, click on Create new file .
Name the file “LICENSE”.…
-
### Search before asking
- [X] I have searched the Ultralytics YOLO [issues](https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/issues) and found no similar bug report.
### Ultralytics YOLO Component
_No …
-
right now `SPDX.normalize("BSD") === "NOASSERTION"`
Looking through a lot of the causes for NOASSERTION, BSD has popped up a lot.
Instead of declaring this as junk, we can consider treating "BSD"…
-
[PEP 639](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0639/) will make this a little better, but once documentation exists we should at least document that looping through the licenses looking for a trove cla…
-
As a rule, GPL and similar (LGPL, AGPL) licenses are not appropriate licenses for SLAC software projects. There are exceptions to this, but for the majority of SLAC projects, you should use a "Modifie…
-
Some free licenses seem not to be recognized:
```
$vrms --list-unknowns
Packages of unknown license on this system: 64
aspell-en: ['custom']
autoconf: ['GPL2', 'GPL3', 'custom']
compface: ['cust…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…
-
```
There are (at lest) two files in the repository that are not licensed under the
New BSD License like the web page and the LICENCE file states.
The files and licences are:
- src/client/mac/handle…