-
It would be very nice to have a survey of provider-supported features. OPTIMADE specification is becoming more and more feature-rich with every merged PR, but it would be enlightening to know how many…
-
Currently we have two forks of this repository for namespaces:
* https://github.com/Materials-Consortia/namespace-cheminformatics
* https://github.com/Materials-Consortia/optimade-stability-namespac…
-
Create and post here suggestions what could be used for testing OPTIMADE and what could be showcased in the paper.
-
This issue duplicates #428 and #34. It is meant to be a short checklist of our current agreed path to get "trajectories" into the OPTIMADE standard.
People listed as trajectory stakeholders: @rarti…
-
Now that #445 is merged, should we remove the property definitions from `optimade.rst`? It does not seem ideal that we have two set of "competing" definitions that could diverge going forward. Technic…
-
What do you think about adding a section to the website for papers and presentations that discusses/uses OPTIMADE?
Perhaps we need to collect a few entries first for it to look good. But perhaps i…
-
Should be done _e.g._ once per week from https://www.optimade.org/providers/links/
-
In a private communication with an industrial provider, exploring the possibilities to support Optimade, I've received rather strong criticism:
- the current description text is unclear and difficu…
-
~Now that validation results are being displayed in the dashboard, some of the error messages could be made much more legible by removing the unnecessary tracebacks (as is already done implicitly for …
-
The server part of OPT is designed as a standalone application, which makes it hard to use it as a library, e.g. include it in another application. I in particular want to use OTP server as part of ou…