-
@saturday06 Hello!
I request permission to change the OSS license for your Pull Request from "MIT" to "MIT or GPL-3.0-or-later multi-license" to meet [The Blender Extensions platform](https://exten…
-
> As Geert Jan van Oldenborgh died in 2021 and FF was unlicensed at the time of his death, until his estate (the current copyright holders) give permission for a license to be used a license, like MIT…
-
While checking the code i found a Apache-2.0 license for the project
https://github.com/hyperxpro/Brotli4j/blob/main/LICENSE
but in the code some files have MIT license headers, for example
-…
-
According to current [automatic merging guidelines](https://juliaregistries.github.io/RegistryCI.jl/v10.9/guidelines/#New-packages), the license file must be located in the project root directory:
…
-
### What type of update are you requesting?
A new version of an existing package
### Current Package Identifier
astral-sh.uv
### Package Version
0.5.5
### Please describe the changes you would l…
-
The license of libm is now: `MIT AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0)`.
After being normalized, it shows up as `Apache-2.0) OR MIT AND (MIT`, which does not make sense.
It looks like it's caused only by the…
-
Choose a license for the project. Apache 2 or MIT
-
I'd like to package Throwable-SugarFactory for Fedora Linux distribution. Throwable-SugarFactory's LICENSE file starts with a waiver which does not technically grant any copyright rights to the recipi…
-
The readme says "This model may not be used for commercial purposes as noted in the license." yet the license is MIT which totally allows commercial usage.
-
## What
We are planning on relicensing Druid under the MIT/Apache 2.0 dual license.
This matches the standard licenses used by Linebender, and it gives [maximum compatibility](https://rust-lang.gi…