-
```
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. mod(83^55;221)
2.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
incorrect calculation: expected 8 (see
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=83^5…
-
Now it's a bit inconsistent and could confuse some users
Tarantool version: 2.3
```lua
tarantool> type(tonumber64('1LL'))
---
- number
...
tarantool> type(tonumber64(1LL))
---
- cdata
…
-
I've been looking at the code for fastcall and vectorcall functions, and one issue seems to be that for a function like:
def f(a, *args, **kwds):
# something...
the wrapper function…
-
We have a handful of utils for emitting lints: `span_lint`, `span_lint_and_help`, etc. We'd like to replace these with one new util named `span_clippy_lint`. It was already implemented in #7668, but n…
-
The JavaScript [Number](http://ecma262-5.com/ELS5_HTML.htm#Section_8.5) type can handle floating point numbers up to 53 bits in precision, but all byte level operations (`>>`, `|`, etc) only work with…
-
```
I tried to verify that the baseflight firmware does not have any obvious bugs
like division by zero, array access out of bound, ...
To do this I used CBMC to verify the loop function in mw.c. Un…
-
```
I tried to verify that the baseflight firmware does not have any obvious bugs
like division by zero, array access out of bound, ...
To do this I used CBMC to verify the loop function in mw.c. Un…
-
```
I tried to verify that the baseflight firmware does not have any obvious bugs
like division by zero, array access out of bound, ...
To do this I used CBMC to verify the loop function in mw.c. Un…
-
```
I tried to verify that the baseflight firmware does not have any obvious bugs
like division by zero, array access out of bound, ...
To do this I used CBMC to verify the loop function in mw.c. Un…
-
```
I tried to verify that the baseflight firmware does not have any obvious bugs
like division by zero, array access out of bound, ...
To do this I used CBMC to verify the loop function in mw.c. Un…