-
```
This implementation choice makes it impossible to use json-simple with Scala
without modification. However, everything works fine when updating the
JSONObject declaration to the following:
publ…
-
```
This implementation choice makes it impossible to use json-simple with Scala
without modification. However, everything works fine when updating the
JSONObject declaration to the following:
publ…
-
```
This implementation choice makes it impossible to use json-simple with Scala
without modification. However, everything works fine when updating the
JSONObject declaration to the following:
publ…
-
```
This implementation choice makes it impossible to use json-simple with Scala
without modification. However, everything works fine when updating the
JSONObject declaration to the following:
publ…
-
```
This implementation choice makes it impossible to use json-simple with Scala
without modification. However, everything works fine when updating the
JSONObject declaration to the following:
publ…
-
See log:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-inbound&revision=9bdd75e358d19acb969e38572e1eeee810313104&selectedJob=238316628
Specifically we get:
> error[E0605]: non-primitive …
-
### Bug Type (问题类型)
other exception / error (其他异常报错)
### Before submit
- [X] 我已经确认现有的 [Issues](https://github.com/apache/hugegraph/issues) 与 [FAQ](https://hugegraph.apache.org/docs/guides/faq…
-
In haskellari/strict#28 (discussion in haskellari/strict#22) I am experimenting with a safer version of strict HashMap, where instances are also strict, by adding ! to the data type definitions. So
…
-
Don't know the reason for `StackOverflowError` or use case, only logs.
Server logs:
```
java.lang.StackOverflowError
at java.util.HashMap.hash(HashMap.java:339)
at java.util.HashMap.get(H…
-