-
After building umu-launcher 1.1.4 on Debian Unstable and installing the resulting packages the following error appears:
```
Setting up python3-umu-launcher (1.1.4-1) ...
Job for apparmor.service …
-
#### What would you like to be added:
The AppArmor CRD should include a flag which defines the mode of the apparmor profile. This will allow to easily switch a profile from complain to audit o…
-
AppArmor seems to be causing issues, with Flatpak installs/updates. Weirdly enough, I don't see any logs related whatsoever. Neither in `journalctl` nor in `aa-log`. It must be AppArmor related, thoug…
-
**Describe the Issue**
When launching an audit, it indicates that the control 1.6.1.3 is failing. While doing my own analysis based on the resource provided in the pdf document _CIS_Ubuntu_Linux_22…
-
This issue aims to present and discuss the various tests applied to the profiles as well as their current stage of deployment.
**Current Status**
- [x] **Build:** `make`
- All CI jobs validat…
-
This issue aims to be an open discussion about possible reorganization of how the profiles are shipped.
The current apparmor.d package ships a lot of profiles. Depending on the target system, they …
-
ERROR: Conflicting profiles for brave defined in two files:
- /etc/apparmor.d/brave
- /etc/apparmor.d/brave.apparmor.d
-
apparmor module is currently disabled in.
-
Last year Ubuntu started to support a new sysctl `kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_userns` that allows the use of user namespaces only if the process is confined by an apparmor profile and includ…
valoq updated
4 weeks ago
-
### Description
Brave doesn't have apparmor profile. Since 24.04 it seems apparmor needs to be running... I tried with profiles from several sources, I even tried to train my own profile, but Brave (…