Closed ghost closed 3 years ago
@t0md3an I agree
This isn't high-priority for Adept 2.4 release, but for Adept 2.5 release this should be changed
I have since decided against it because:
For the most part, I intend on keeping the syntax similar between 2.x versions of Adept.
@IsaacShelton After adding new syntax I think standart library should has this syntax too. I know that this is a lot of time.