Closed sudo-gecko closed 3 years ago
Thanks for the report.
@ameshkov, if I recall correctly, we already plan to split DoH address from the HTTP interface address in the next API version?
Yep, that's right.
@ainar-g let's discuss this one internally, I am just thinking we could use dns.bind_host
instead without any IP changes?
Same problem here. With 0.0.0.0 dns_hosts Adguard home haven't listed on multiple interfaces, so I specifically configured it to listen to multiple. After that Adguard started to listen on ports 53, 784, 853 on all interfaces I included in dns_hosts. But the funny thing is that it hasn't worked for DoH on port 443, it is still listening to one interface only.
I have Adguard Home beta v0.106.0-b.1
P.S. ребят, спасибо за вашу работу!
@DavidOsipov, спасибо!
And yes, we do plan on separating HTTP setting and DoH settings at much as possible in one of the future releases.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Problem Description
DoH(DNS-over-https) is not available through the IP of bind_host in DNS settings.
In the case of the above configuration, DoH cannot be used through the domain because the DoH port has not been opened for the domain pointing to IP-2, so DoH can only be used if the domain points to IP-1.
Proposed Solution
The DoH server should also be opened with the bind_host IP in DNS settings.
Additional Information
If you leave a comment for the lack of explanation, I will respond quickly.