Open ibksturm opened 5 years ago
What about this link? https://kb.adguard.com/en/general/dns-providers
pretty cool!
yeah somethink like that i‘d think about, but in a more „includet“ way as i wrote up there 🤩
b) any ootions somebody could put more dns server into the list? or could the list autosync in parts with dnscrypt (work do twice makes zero)
yeah somethink like that i‘d think about, but in a more „includet“ way as i wrote up there 🤩
So basically you want a beautiful list to choose from?
b) any ootions somebody could put more dns server into the list? or could the list autosync in parts with dnscrypt (work do twice makes zero)
Sure, you can PR it here: http://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardKnowledgeBase
yeah exact, just in other words but exactly what i mean
hi there
i did some work an ad some doh, dot and dnsc servers
hope they are usefull
What about this link? https://kb.adguard.com/en/general/dns-providers
Like that however i feel too annoying to copy paste from that site or write manually
l see upstream and bootstrap DNS fields have too long horizontal length space then it's possible to split it to two separate fields unless consider to keep for write DNS stamps within one row and another side able to use for display recently used several DNS servers with auto input (by click) feature then it helpful for us to move between servers easily.
Display pre-defined list may promote dns providers :(
@ainar-g this feature request is still open, do you have a planned ETA? It was originally suggested in 2019. For reference here was my request.
[X] I have checked the Wiki and Discussions and found no answer
[X] I have searched other issues and found no duplicates
[X] I want to request a feature or enhancement and not ask a question
Manually finding Bootstrap & Upstream DNS servers
Drop Down list for Bootstrap & Upstream DNS servers
Radio Buttons & Upload function
N/A
There is no ETA. Anyone who wants this feature more than the others should use the :+1: reaction on the original issue, as we use those as an indicator for what the community wants.
There is no ETA. Anyone who wants this feature more than the others should use the 👍 reaction on the original issue, as we use those as an indicator for what the community wants.
The message in the original post is not very clear for the viewer. Can you update it to make it more understandable? That would be helpful.
What about using public-servers as it already contains information like logging, blocking and supported protocols.
If it helps you can use the two api to obtain an updated list of open resolvers, from the dns crypt project:
https://api.github.com/repos/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-resolvers/contents/v2
https://api.github.com/repos/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-resolvers/contents/v3
Dobri dem Guys
an hour ago i had an idear about resolvers under the shower
idear:
i think there should 2 option
a) default servers as now (doh cloudflare and maybe tls / doh / dnsc quad9) without user interogation
b) extended
maybe with selectboxes dnssec, filters and protocol
frank @jedisct1 got some knowledge from dnscrypt-proxy about filtering
ok if i thinking forward, with this idear, there should be one or more public lists with server which you could link to... example dnsprivacy.org or dnscrypt-resolvers...
maybe the baselist are in a equal format as frank do it... so people could put their servers on frank lists and you link (dnsc, doh) to it and / or you maintain your own list (dnscrypt / doh / tls)
just thinking loud, maybe its an option, maybe not :)
let us talk about
greets and happy easter monday