search

AmadeusITGroup / sonar-stash

Stash (BitBucket) plugin, a pull-request decorator which allows to integrate SonarQube violations directly into your pull-request
MIT License
165 stars 82 forks source link

Unable to push SonarQube analysis overview to Stash #188

Open BattleLoot opened 6 years ago

BattleLoot commented 6 years ago

Hi Everyone,

I got next error when I tried to analyze my Hybris extensions:

Sonar 6.7.3 Jenkins 2.121.1 BitBucket 4.13.0 sonar-stash plugin 1.4.0

12:47:15 12:47:15.313 DEBUG: Using open Channel [id: 0x367c05d0, L:/10.17.221.17:44688 - R:/10.17.221.104:7990] for POST '/rest/api/1.0/projects/MyProjects/repos/MyRepo/pull-requests/4/comments'
12:47:15 12:47:15.490 DEBUG: 
12:47:15 
12:47:15 Request DefaultFullHttpRequest(decodeResult: success, version: HTTP/1.1, content: SlicedAbstractByteBuf(freed))
12:47:15 POST /rest/api/1.0/projects/MyProjects/repos/MyRepo/pull-requests/4/comments HTTP/1.1
12:47:15 Content-Type: application/json
12:47:15 Accept: application/json
12:47:15 Content-Length: 83282
12:47:15 Host: IP:7990
12:47:15 Authorization: Basic
12:47:15 User-Agent: SonarQube/6.7.3.38370 Stash/1.4.0-SNAPSHOT AHC/2.0
12:47:15 
12:47:15 Response DefaultHttpResponse(decodeResult: success, version: HTTP/1.1)
12:47:15 HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
12:47:15 Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
12:47:15 X-AREQUESTID: @Q2L54Mx587x69482x0
12:47:15 X-ASEN: SEN-L11963680
12:47:15 X-AUSERID: 2
12:47:15 X-AUSERNAME: SonarQube
12:47:15 Cache-Control: no-cache, no-transform
12:47:15 Vary: X-AUSERNAME,Accept-Encoding
12:47:15 Transfer-Encoding: chunked
12:47:15 Content-Type: application/json;charset=UTF-8
12:47:15 X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
12:47:15 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:47:14 GMT
12:47:15 Connection: close
12:47:15 
12:47:15 12:47:15.490 DEBUG: Closing Channel [id: 0x367c05d0, L:/10.17.221.17:44688 - R:/10.17.221.104:7990] 
12:47:15 12:47:15.491 DEBUG: Channel Closed: [id: 0x367c05d0, L:/10.17.221.17:44688 ! R:/10.17.221.104:7990] with attribute INSTANCE
12:47:15 12:47:15.494 ERROR: Unable to push SonarQube analysis overview to Stash
12:47:15 org.sonar.plugins.stash.exceptions.StashClientException: Unable to post a comment to MyRepo #4. Received 400: null: Please enter a non-empty value less than 32768 characters
12:47:15    at org.sonar.plugins.stash.client.StashClient.validateResponse(StashClient.java:379)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.plugins.stash.client.StashClient.performRequest(StashClient.java:363)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.plugins.stash.client.StashClient.postCreate(StashClient.java:318)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.plugins.stash.client.StashClient.postCommentOnPullRequest(StashClient.java:111)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.plugins.stash.StashRequestFacade.postAnalysisOverview(StashRequestFacade.java:69)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.plugins.stash.StashIssueReportingPostJob.postInfoAndPRsActions(StashIssueReportingPostJob.java:138)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.plugins.stash.StashIssueReportingPostJob.updateStashWithSonarInfo(StashIssueReportingPostJob.java:105)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.plugins.stash.StashIssueReportingPostJob.execute(StashIssueReportingPostJob.java:58)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.postjob.PostJobWrapper.executeOn(PostJobWrapper.java:58)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.phases.PostJobsExecutor.execute(PostJobsExecutor.java:66)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.phases.PostJobsExecutor.execute(PostJobsExecutor.java:55)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.phases.AbstractPhaseExecutor.execute(AbstractPhaseExecutor.java:94)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.scan.ModuleScanContainer.doAfterStart(ModuleScanContainer.java:180)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.core.platform.ComponentContainer.startComponents(ComponentContainer.java:135)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.core.platform.ComponentContainer.execute(ComponentContainer.java:121)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.scan.ProjectScanContainer.scan(ProjectScanContainer.java:288)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.scan.ProjectScanContainer.scanRecursively(ProjectScanContainer.java:283)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.scan.ProjectScanContainer.doAfterStart(ProjectScanContainer.java:261)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.core.platform.ComponentContainer.startComponents(ComponentContainer.java:135)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.core.platform.ComponentContainer.execute(ComponentContainer.java:121)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.task.ScanTask.execute(ScanTask.java:48)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.task.TaskContainer.doAfterStart(TaskContainer.java:84)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.core.platform.ComponentContainer.startComponents(ComponentContainer.java:135)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.core.platform.ComponentContainer.execute(ComponentContainer.java:121)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.scanner.bootstrap.GlobalContainer.executeTask(GlobalContainer.java:121)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.batch.bootstrapper.Batch.doExecuteTask(Batch.java:116)
12:47:15    at org.sonar.batch.bootstrapper.Batch.execute(Batch.java:71)
12:47:15    at org.sonarsource.scanner.api.internal.batch.BatchIsolatedLauncher.execute(BatchIsolatedLauncher.java:46)
12:47:15    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
12:47:15    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
12:47:15    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
12:47:15    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
12:47:15    at org.sonarsource.scanner.api.internal.IsolatedLauncherProxy.invoke(IsolatedLauncherProxy.java:60)
12:47:15    at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy0.execute(Unknown Source)
12:47:15    at org.sonarsource.scanner.api.EmbeddedScanner.doExecute(EmbeddedScanner.java:171)
12:47:15    at org.sonarsource.scanner.api.EmbeddedScanner.execute(EmbeddedScanner.java:128)
12:47:15    at org.sonarsource.scanner.cli.Main.execute(Main.java:111)
12:47:15    at org.sonarsource.scanner.cli.Main.execute(Main.java:75)
12:47:15    at org.sonarsource.scanner.cli.Main.main(Main.java:61)
t-8ch commented 6 years ago

Hi @BattleLoot , Bitbucket rejects the report because it is too large. We should probably push multiple comments and have a sane cutoff to not swamp the PR with comments.

The reason your report is this large could be because you forgot to perform a full analysis, so every issue is reported on the PR. Could you doublecheck this?