AtlasOfLivingAustralia / spatial-service

Spatial web services and layer administration console
https://spatial.ala.org.au/ws
2 stars 11 forks source link

Generate yearly summaries for State of the Environment Reporting #75

Closed Tasilee closed 1 year ago

Tasilee commented 7 years ago

The ALA is in an ideal position to support the generation of Essential Biodiversity Variables and State of the Environment indicators. We can leverage the volume of occurrence data to produce new 'environmental' layers for each bio-summary value. As a start we could match what Albert Van Dijk has done with http://wenfo.org/ausenv/#/2000/Tree_cover/Region/Actual/States_and%20Territories/bar,options/-28.96/135.00/4/none/Roadmap/Opaque

Areas needed to support (1 value/area) are

State/Territories (got), SLAs (got), LGAs (got, Catchments (got - level 2), Bioregions (got), CAPAD (parks/reserves) (got), Ramsar wetlands (got).

In effect, under any map layer (year by value), there is a table that minimally contains polygon name/id, value in polygon. E.g., an entry for Sorell (LGA) for 2005 is 0.013 for endemism. Values would be calculated each year on the last day of the year from (minimally) 2000 as a baseline to present.

The preliminary summary values are as much 'state of knowledge' but are a practical start-

Maximum endemism (I think this will be more informtive than averages) Maximum occurrence density Maximum richness Maximum Shannon diversity Number of endemics Number of invasives Number of Threatened (etc). Number of bird species

We will automatically support the current intersect web service but we may need to generate/maintain a table of areas by the above values?

Tasilee commented 6 years ago

From meeting with Albert VanDijk December 4, 2017

  1. Monthly summary layers (occurrence density, species richness, endemicity and Shannon diversity) still seen as useful but spotty spatially. If reported at IBRA 7 subregion scale however (which implies some level of ecosystem homogeneity), maybe good. Noted that endemicity is less influenced by roads and population density. Yearly DOI snapshot. Two ways at least of generating the table.

    1. Focus on spatial subset of areas identified by loss of tree cover. Data for this is a 2x2 contingency table e.g.,

                                      2017
                             Forest             Not forest
         Forest           static               Cleared         

      2016 Not forest revegetated static

  2. Focus on deforested areas and intersect with endemism and/or richness data for the area (values in grid cells). Could standardize by the occurrence density values for same cells. Idea is loss of richness is place and area dependent. Loss in central Australia is less important than in high diverse/endemic areas?

  3. Produce monthly summary layers for invasives and threatened species subsets

  4. Annual summary layers using 2000 as a baseline (keep all) a. Endemism b. Species richness c. Number of 'invasives' d. Number of 'threatened' e. Number of birds f. Graph of years vs values above (across all grid cells)

Would be good to have results before mid-February 2018 for 2017 report.

Tasilee commented 6 years ago

Given the type of functionality needed, it seems useful to have a generic layer difference function. You specify layer A and layer B and a new layer C is produced as A-B. Under Tools: Layer difference?

Tasilee commented 6 years ago

Other than the 6 summary layers, the deforested area produces a report (which could apply to any compare areas A and B scenario). In this case, we focus on the species list of occurrences IN the deforested area and OUT of that area. The (exportable) table has a line for each species IN the (deforested, or any given) area and columns

Species name

Occurences OUT of the area

Occurences IN the area (note IN+OUT=total spacial occurrences in ALA)

%difference (100*IN/OUT) Species code (I=invasive, T=threatened, blank=no category)

-------down the track as a generic tool, we could also have:

If OUT was a selected contextual layer, we have a column for each class (#occurrences in class) If OUT was an environmental layer, we have columns for minimum, maximum and average.

Tasilee commented 5 years ago

In discussion with Adam, the strategy will be to replace the monthly updates with the yearly equivalents (run in January) with the additions using UP TO December 31 2000 as a baseline.

  1. Add number of invasives, threatened and birds (latter as demo) to occurrences, richness, endemism and shannon diversity
  2. Layers up to just prior end of year are all re-run as occurrences on prior years could have been added during any subsequent year
  3. We must maintain layers for each year from 2000

We have generated a new issue for the A-B contextual layer function. This will generate a square table of transitions between layers (which don't have to be years) with entries of AREA (sqkm) that LINKS to the relevant polygons/s. We can then use these polygons (e.g., forest to non-forest with Compare areas. What we are doing here is a specific subset of the Tabulation tool - but we focus on AREA, given we can do an area report of any defined area.

There is an existing issue for A-B for environmental layers (which the annual summaries will be) that will aid SOE reporting.

Tasilee commented 5 years ago

BTW - the Tool | Points to grid can do a snapshot of occurrence density and species richness based on user selected name-space-time