Closed ivan-ottinger closed 1 year ago
@ivan-ottinger This would become https://wordpress.com/subscribers/<siteslug>
right?
@ivan-ottinger looking at the current paths I see routes such as /sites/<siteid>/subscribers/import
. Wouldn't it be better to have our route be /sites/<siteid>/subscribers
?
@ivan-ottinger This would become https://wordpress.com/subscribers/
right?
Yes, that is where the currently developed page lives.
@ivan-ottinger looking at the current paths I see routes such as /sites/
/subscribers/import. Wouldn't it be better to have our route be /sites/ /subscribers?
🤔 What does load at /sites/<siteid>/subscribers/import
for you? I am seeing just a blank screen there.
@ivan-ottinger This would become https://wordpress.com/subscribers/ right?
Yes, that is where the currently developed page lives.
@ivan-ottinger looking at the current paths I see routes such as /sites//subscribers/import. Wouldn't it be better to have our route be /sites//subscribers?
🤔 What does load at
/sites/<siteid>/subscribers/import
for you? I am seeing just a blank screen there.
Nevermind, I was just OpenGrokking and wrongfully assumed something (it was an API call). Sorry for the confusion!
Posted in systemrequests: pMz3w-hHc-p2
No worries at all! Thank you for submitting the request, Tim!
/subscribers
is now loading nicely (with the feature flag enabled) in staging. 🙂
Similarly as with the
/subscriptions
page before (pMz3w-haX-p2), we will likely need to request/subscribers
to be pointed to Calypso as well.At the moment,
/subscribers
lands in Calypso, but in the development environment only.