Closed oyri closed 2 years ago
This PR is idle because it has been open for 14 days with no activity.
Hello @oyri, Thanks for raising the PR. I have a question in this change. There has been a recent breaking change in Trivy which we fixed in #123. Have you considered the case where the input version is an earlier version where we don't need to provide with image
in the trivy command? Can you also handle that case in this PR?
Since this is a replacement of #125. Request you to close it. Appreciate your contribution in making this action better 👍🏾
Hello @oyri, Thanks for raising the PR. I have a question in this change. There has been a recent breaking change in Trivy which we fixed in #123. Have you considered the case where the input version is an earlier version where we don't need to provide with
image
in the trivy command? Can you also handle that case in this PR?
I can do that, but my point with this PR was to support future breaking changes in Trivy, so the image/no image command is not that important, but for consistency it should be included.
I do not understand the build system her, master branches does not have the fix of #123? I will need to include this to handle the "image" command part, thus need to merge from the correct branch into mine.
@oyri: This change has been included in #129 and #123 for master. I think you need to pull the latest changes from master. or create a new fork. Thanks for pointing it out. I also see the old changes in your files. For some reason the diff against the latest master is not reflecting properly in the PR
@oyri: This change has been included in #129 and #123 for master. I think you need to pull the latest changes from master. or create a new fork. Thanks for pointing it out. I also see the old changes in your files. For some reason the diff against the latest master is not reflecting properly in the PR
The first PR was against a release branch, but PR 123 was against master, and got included. Thus I created this PR from master instead. Why master does not contain any of the recent production changes might indicate a non-standard branch setup? Would be great if a maintainer of this repo could guide me through this?
@oyri #128 is the PR for releases branch. I think both master and releases branch are in sync. I checked the commits on your forked branch. It is missing few commits from the master. Request you to update your branch with master. Also, can you run npm run-script build
and also add the generated .js
files in the PR?
FYI, for any contribution we accept the changes in master. And port the changes to the release branch. Code in releases actually run in actions.
Sorry about the back and forth here, now I have finally fetch the upstream, merged master and also run the build script.
@oyri trivyHelper.test.ts
tests are failing due to recent change. Either mock return latest
for the trivyVersion
or fix the failing case. You can run the tests using npm test
. Suggestion for test changes
const inputHelper = require('../src/inputHelper')
inputHelper.trivyVersion = 'latest'
@oyri
trivyHelper.test.ts
tests are failing due to recent change. Either mock returnlatest
for thetrivyVersion
or fix the failing case. You can run the tests usingnpm test
. Suggestion for test changesconst inputHelper = require('../src/inputHelper') inputHelper.trivyVersion = 'latest'
I added a new test as well, maybe not the best way to do it with the mocking, not familliar with Jest.
To enable to use previous version av Trivy when breaking changes occur before container-scan action is updated. If not set, default is latest version.
This pull request replaces https://github.com/Azure/container-scan/pull/125 which has base release-branch, but the current has base master.