Open TommiPrami opened 3 years ago
Yes, it should. This is also the reason, why whole the TFLREThreadLocalStorageInstance stuff exists.
If you could, put this on the readme.md, valuable information.
Thanks man!
-Tee-
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:41 AM Benjamin Rosseaux @.***> wrote:
Yes, it should. This is also the reason, why whole the TFLREThreadLocalStorageInstance stuff exists.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/BeRo1985/flre/issues/80#issuecomment-895015988, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA7E2H7RLVYQF3O7IEJM2TTT36BA3ANCNFSM5BZKQM5Q . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&utm_campaign=notification-email .
IF I do Following:
... GFLRE := TFLRE.Create(C_REG_EXP_STRING): ...
Thread 1: GFLRE.MartchAll(StringDataOFThread1Contect)
Thread 2: GFLRE.MartchAll(StringDataOFThread2Contect)
So multiple thread would share TFLRE instance but would run it on data in threads own context.