Track: Question: `template-msc` number for `Reply` (not `in thread`)?

In fact adding a template for Reply is not as easy as matrix-commander/blob/078da5f16c9b94893939ad19a21677f84a8625f9/event-templates/template-msc3440-thread.json.

According to Element desktop:

The former requires the following parameters:

user identifier
initial message text
answer message
room id
initial message id

While we would have expected:

answer message
initial message id

Furthermore, In reply to is hardcoded despite the languages of other conversation members.

grep -rwl 'in_reply_to' -m 1

proposals/3952-intentional-mentions.md
proposals/3676-transitioning-away-from-reply-fallbacks.md
proposals/2674-event-relationships.md
proposals/2676-message-editing.md
proposals/3440-threading-via-relations.md

Assuming that matrix-commander/tree/078da5f16c9b94893939ad19a21677f84a8625f9/event-templates are specific to a given proposal, then only the first 3 proposals seem relevant. Actually only the second seems quite relevant but in fact it is does not seem to introduce in_reply_to, it is still unclear what template-msc number would be appropriate.

I hope that a dedicated proposal will be published for Matrix to support replying to a message without having to provide redundant fields.

Benjamin-Loison / matrix-commander

Track: Question: `template-msc` number for `Reply` (not `in thread`)? #14