UX: Order of Node Status

[ChristopherA]

I'd like to see the items associated with this specific node at the top, and those with the network as a whole nearer the bottom.

I open, but I think the right order might be:

• Uptime
• Synced
• Blocks (or if pruned: {pruned parameter} of XX Blocks)
• Size XXX GB + Free Space XX GB (ideally one line)
• Pruned /Full/Full-txindex
• Peers In/Out (ideally one line)
• local Mempool / total UTXOs
• Fee rate
• Hashrate
• Difficulty

I might also argue the last two shouldn't be on this panel, but some other UX later.

[ChristopherA]

Hmm, probably should mark visibly that you have "private" on.

[ChristopherA]

At minimum for release 1.0.0 the ordering needs to be address, even if new options are not integrated.

[Fonta1n3]

Can reorder but the other requests are time consuming and will likely not be approved on first iteration as it requires a rework of the UI. I'll change the order now though 👍🏻

[Fonta1n3]

Fee rate doesn't make sense as there is no user specified fee target in GS. This requires more work to add as we need to add UI to prompt user to tell us what their target is.

[shannona]

Order has been rearranged.