Open gianx89 opened 14 hours ago
I have thought about this in the past, I made a note to explore a library called "Burr" - but I have not yet had time to play around with it or thoroughly think about how integrated I want it to be within Atomic Agents, or maybe as a layer around it or, ..., as there are many use cases where going the graph/DAG-route would cause additional overhead and inflexibility (especially when heavily interspersing AI agents with traditional code, where you are treating AI agents as just another function albeit one that does something more advanced than other functions)
I am not too familiar with AutoGen anymore, but from what I can read, you should be able to do any of the speaker selection/transition stuff using Unions
You can use this example, but replace tool schemas with the schemas of other agents: https://github.com/BrainBlend-AI/atomic-agents/blob/main/atomic-examples/orchestration-agent/orchestration_agent/orchestrator.py
Note, however, that from a practical use case point of view, I have not found much use in this yet as it tends to go off the rails quite a bit with hallucinations etc..
What is your use case if I may ask?
Question: Multi-Agent RAG System Based on Graphs
Hi,
Is it possible to create a Multi-Agent RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system based on graphs? I want to define the agents, specify how they communicate through a graph, and start the chat until an agreement is reached.
Currently, I am implementing this using Autogen, and I’d like to understand how to achieve it using atomic-agents. Specifically, I am using features like:
speaker_selection_method
allowed_or_disallowed_speaker_transitions
Could you please provide some code examples if possible?
Thank you!