In an earlier version of AEGeAn, intron genes (gene A completely encompassed by an intron from gene B) were designated as complex iLoci (ciLoci): both the intron gene and the gene containing it were associated with a single ciLocus.
Later, in the context of hiLoci I think, we decided that intron genes could be parsed and handled separately. Currently intron gene cases yield two siLoci, the smaller of which is contained completely within the other.
We're agreed that we don't want to designate such cases as miLoci when merging tightly packed genes. But in terms of classification, does it make more sense to designate the larger gene a ciLocus? Or both genes?
In an earlier version of AEGeAn, intron genes (gene A completely encompassed by an intron from gene B) were designated as complex iLoci (ciLoci): both the intron gene and the gene containing it were associated with a single ciLocus.
Later, in the context of hiLoci I think, we decided that intron genes could be parsed and handled separately. Currently intron gene cases yield two siLoci, the smaller of which is contained completely within the other.
We're agreed that we don't want to designate such cases as miLoci when merging tightly packed genes. But in terms of classification, does it make more sense to designate the larger gene a ciLocus? Or both genes?