search

CNMAT / CNMAT-odot

Multi-paradigm Dynamic Programming
Other
115 stars 11 forks source link

o.expr.codebox number literals support broken #293

Closed ilzxc closed 9 years ago

ilzxc commented 9 years ago

It seems that all number literals are read as int32 -- which means you can not bind the maximum uint32 using a literal...


----------begin_max5_patcher----------
444.3oc4TEqSCCCDcN4qvxS.JTRbbaZQhUlYGgPtItfKo1QNNUAp5+NNmSaR
QsPTECHwxIcmO+tme9Yuw2COWUyKwnaQOh771364AkZJ30l6gWwpSyYkPaX0
nLQYQN6cbfaUCu1.qbSsMRhnIzowSnI6VWVsRUYx4FX+QsUKXlzWExWdVySM
t4SFGNJL.kPahQtjXaB5o18HxbLX9xqiB2AuCay6EbGJX799aXVpJWocqDA3
1OruyEJoYAKEfHrWsRwGPsHxnvtiiPt+zzTaqueSHXvBHutPOJUkwaZ7Hp3c
nJgzDStfRlQmMIwFu73pI4GUSBAhgIfZRNtZN8jh48U44OvReiavAGjcJQFF
ZW3LE4BMujKMLiPI6clngS.PoGLk8C3W3p4a81cWGmg2dvV6w+Gb1ceSbI5J
D4Lb2C1bG+WybeRcF.CmKje8GYP.Zpen3Wppzo6NLsuiQcTJiWZDR3MTudZ9
4rWSuJxx3x9r19DfMOmCBX3QcACkNwCfNiOS13zJVQwZttrERfHVK4R28UR.
jJjtT.QrluVrqeJTgoslKi0YUoAxiqmNA61p0HqkUh16I6j25+YD9mZP
-----------end_max5_patcher-----------
maccallum commented 9 years ago

This is by design—we made the decision at one point that the default should conform to the OSC spec. The solution to this is to support suffix types like C. Please close this and open a new one reminding us that the syntax of the language needs to support suffix type annotations.

On Jul 15, 2015, at 10:54 PM, ilya notifications@github.com wrote:

It seems that all number literals are read as int32 -- which means you can not bind the maximum uint32 using a literal...

----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 444.3oc4TEqSCCCDcN4qvxS.JTRbbaZQhUlYGgPtItfKo1QNNUAp5+NNmSaR QsPTECHwxIcmO+tme9Yuw2COWUyKwnaQOh771364AkZJ30l6gWwpSyYkPaX0 nLQYQN6cbfaUCu1.qbSsMRhnIzowSnI6VWVsRUYx4FX+QsUKXlzWExWdVySM t4SFGNJL.kPahQtjXaB5o18HxbLX9xqiB2AuCay6EbGJX799aXVpJWocqDA3 1OruyEJoYAKEfHrWsRwGPsHxnvtiiPt+zzTaqueSHXvBHutPOJUkwaZ7Hp3c nJgzDStfRlQmMIwFu73pI4GUSBAhgIfZRNtZN8jh48U44OvReiavAGjcJQFF ZW3LE4BMujKMLiPI6clngS.PoGLk8C3W3p4a81cWGmg2dvV6w+Gb1ceSbI5J D4Lb2C1bG+WybeRcF.CmKje8GYP.Zpen3Wppzo6NLsuiQcTJiWZDR3MTudZ9 4rWSuJxx3x9r19DfMOmCBX3QcACkNwCfNiOS13zJVQwZttrERfHVK4R28UR. jJjtT.QrluVrqeJTgoslKi0YUoAxiqmNA61p0HqkUh16I6j25+YD9mZP -----------end_max5_patcher----------- — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/CNMAT/CNMAT-odot/issues/293.

ilzxc commented 9 years ago

This has pretty deep implications -- thanks for the quick response.

On Jul 16, 2015, at 10:23 AM, John MacCallum notifications@github.com wrote:

This is by design—we made the decision at one point that the default should conform to the OSC spec. The solution to this is to support suffix types like C. Please close this and open a new one reminding us that the syntax of the language needs to support suffix type annotations.

On Jul 15, 2015, at 10:54 PM, ilya notifications@github.com wrote:

It seems that all number literals are read as int32 -- which means you can not bind the maximum uint32 using a literal...

----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 444.3oc4TEqSCCCDcN4qvxS.JTRbbaZQhUlYGgPtItfKo1QNNUAp5+NNmSaR QsPTECHwxIcmO+tme9Yuw2COWUyKwnaQOh771364AkZJ30l6gWwpSyYkPaX0 nLQYQN6cbfaUCu1.qbSsMRhnIzowSnI6VWVsRUYx4FX+QsUKXlzWExWdVySM t4SFGNJL.kPahQtjXaB5o18HxbLX9xqiB2AuCay6EbGJX799aXVpJWocqDA3 1OruyEJoYAKEfHrWsRwGPsHxnvtiiPt+zzTaqueSHXvBHutPOJUkwaZ7Hp3c nJgzDStfRlQmMIwFu73pI4GUSBAhgIfZRNtZN8jh48U44OvReiavAGjcJQFF ZW3LE4BMujKMLiPI6clngS.PoGLk8C3W3p4a81cWGmg2dvV6w+Gb1ceSbI5J D4Lb2C1bG+WybeRcF.CmKje8GYP.Zpen3Wppzo6NLsuiQcTJiWZDR3MTudZ9 4rWSuJxx3x9r19DfMOmCBX3QcACkNwCfNiOS13zJVQwZttrERfHVK4R28UR. jJjtT.QrluVrqeJTgoslKi0YUoAxiqmNA61p0HqkUh16I6j25+YD9mZP -----------end_max5_patcher----------- — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/CNMAT/CNMAT-odot/issues/293.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.