See https://github.com/COMPASS-DOE/ghg-processor/issues/9#issuecomment-1432894416 - this PR rearranges things so that first we fit the model (as ppm/s or ppm/s), and then we compute fluxes in converted units (mmol or µmol/m2/day). This allows for the intercept (and slope for that matter) of the model to be in more intuitive units during QA/QC.
Will merge as soon as @wilsonsj100 confirms this is what she wants.
This looks great Ben! I like the idea of checking the intercept prior to calculating fluxes per area. The intercepts look pretty on target from your rearranged graph above.
See https://github.com/COMPASS-DOE/ghg-processor/issues/9#issuecomment-1432894416 - this PR rearranges things so that first we fit the model (as ppm/s or ppm/s), and then we compute fluxes in converted units (mmol or µmol/m2/day). This allows for the intercept (and slope for that matter) of the model to be in more intuitive units during QA/QC.
Will merge as soon as @wilsonsj100 confirms this is what she wants.