In the old version, CF TYPE could be set to max here, has it been cancelled in the new version?

Cacti / cacti

Cacti ™

http://www.cacti.net

GNU General Public License v2.0

1.63k stars 404 forks source link

In the old version, CF TYPE could be set to max here, has it been cancelled in the new version? #5657

Open aliuzzz opened 8 months ago

aliuzzz commented 8 months ago

Can we change average to max？

TheWitness commented 8 months ago

This is controlled by the HRULE rules vs. the consolidation function though I see the point when coming from 0.8.x.

aliuzzz commented 8 months ago

So, you means that it cannot be modified to MAX, but it will not affect the normal data results.The results are the same as the 0.8.x. This is important to me and I hope to receive confirmation

TheWitness commented 7 months ago

There is a custom aggregation method for max of max. Here are the available aggregations group by those that are identical. There are duplicates.

current - Current from AVG
max - Max from MAX
total, all_max_current - Total from AVG
total_peak, all_max_peak - Total from MAX
aggregate, aggregate_sum - Total from AVG
aggregate_peak, aggregate_max, aggregate_sum_peak - Total from MAX
aggregate_current - Total from AVG
aggregate_current_max - Total from MAX

Let me know if any of these get you to where you want to go?

aliuzzz commented 7 months ago

aggregate_peak, aggregate_max, aggregate_sum_peak - Total from MAX

aliuzzz commented 7 months ago

Also, do different aggregation methods affect the results of the csv table? I created an aggregation graph that aggregates several graphs using the "Interface - Traffic (bits/sec, 95th) " template. But the total column always matches the inbound traffic, while the 95 percentile on the graph will display normally according to the difference between inbound and outbound

dd43a778639105d876f70e86733ba685 0b30b4a46ae03594be5e42c6c958fc2d