Open camiplata opened 1 year ago
There are also many copies of the same names, e.g. Doradidae
:
https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/2037/name/e47fc3b7-d540-4b5a-b1ec-03680f259d42
@deepreef any chance to remove the unspecified agent from the export?
There are also other bad names that use [none]
or odd accordingTo values like sensu 1999.… 1999
:
Many thanks for pointing these out. There is a LOT of clean-up we need to do, and that will be included in the grant proposal later this year. But if there are particularly problematic records, like the ones above, I can probably set aside some time next weekend to clean them up.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by removing the Unspecified Agent from the export -- do you mean in terms of that agent as an author of exported publications?
yes @deepreef, we mean to remove Unspecified Agent as an author to avoid combinations such as:
OK, I can change the way the author is presented when not known. This is a tag we use to indicate that we have not tracked down the original publication. But if it would be better to present a Null value in the output, I can certainly do that.
Dear @deepreef, we would like to know if it is possible to remove the placeholder
Yes! But... we're still in the process of migrating our web server to a much more robust infrastructure. This was supposed to have been completed last year, but there have been delays. The IPT needs to be re-established on the server that currently holds the live database. It's on the to-do list, but not sure exactly when it will happen. I will make sure the "
Thanks for your reply @deepreef. All the best for the migration
dwc:scientificNameAuthorship has empty values as: "< Unspecified Agent >", 46902 records (11%) are affected by it, 43299 genus, 173 species, 1 subspecies.
See: https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/2037/taxon/bbb21db2-66ac-47ea-836f-805854c026d8