Closed tomschenkjr closed 6 years ago
For this, let's push back on this comment. There are a few reasons why we don't want to pursue this line of research in this paper:
Here is the original source, from Whitman and Nevers, which led to the breakwater analysis and subsequent removal of certain beaches from the model: Escherichia coli Sampling Reliability at a Frequently Closed Chicago Beach: Monitoring and Management Implications, which cites Foreshore Sand as a Source of Escherichia coli in Nearshore Water of a Lake Michigan Beach by the same authors.
Both papers are case studies of 63rd Avenue Beach in Chicago, and discuss the mechanisms which presumably result in higher E. coli levels due to the breakwater.
Regarding the city messing with breakwaters, I've pinged the Park District to check in on that.
The Park District provided an interesting report about a project where it installed a protective barrier in the water at Calumet Beach in 2012 in an attempt to create a safe swimming zone. After data collection and analysis over the summer, they concluded that off-shore sources of microbial contamination were reduced but on-shore, runoff sources were trapped. As a result, no significant difference was found inside the swimming area vs. outside. The barrier was removed at the end of the 2012 season.
I found some more discussion and a citation in an old issue: https://github.com/Chicago/predicting-e-coli-concentrations/issues/1#issuecomment-331267212
@nicklucius - let's include a brief explanation for this in the submission letter to the editor. Use these references to create a paragraph on this topic.
@tomschenkjr - I added a paragraph to the letter. Please review.
Looks good