Is Cuis syntax frozen or still open for suggestions and changes?
example:
for denoting characters with $ , for white-space chars, why not use something more intuitive than $ (20) , $ (09) ? For example, $(space), $(tab), or $(\s) , $(\t).
I'm aware of Character space, Character tab, options.
This is a valid discussion. I don't know about the possible consequences, but I suggest telling this in our mail list, https://lists.cuis.st/mailman/listinfo/cuis-dev , where interesting discussion will follow.
Is Cuis syntax frozen or still open for suggestions and changes?
example: for denoting characters with
$
, for white-space chars, why not use something more intuitive than$ (20)
,$ (09)
? For example,$(space)
,$(tab)
, or$(\s)
,$(\t)
. I'm aware ofCharacter space
,Character tab
, options.Oh, and why
$ (20)
and not just$(20)
?