TASK: Rename identical OOVPAs to parameter format method

[RadWolfie]

I am seeing a few has something not acceptable format as example provided below.

both are main functions except also different old/new revision call

What's not acceptable is:

• Example (old, one parameter)
• Example2 (new, two parameters)

What's really acceptable is:

• Example_4 (old, one parameter)
• Example_8 (new, two parameters)

Reason?

• It should follow similar to Example@4, Example@8 which had been exported for other module to use these functions.
• Both same call functions aren't going to be used within same XDK build. Since I had not seen one occurred, I think.

[jarupxx]

Looks like subroutines called from the main function.

• Example (main function)
• Example2 (sub routine)

So, acceptable add a parameter Example@xx, Example2@xx to use these functions. Taking format into consideration, not acceptable the D3DDevice_BeginPush2, I think.

[RadWolfie]

Revised explanation clearly to meant both Example and Example2 are main functions.

If a main function has same name as sub routine, then Example2 as sub routine is correct. Except really need to add a note above plus XREF flag too.

Also, if both main and sub routine has more/less arguments. Then we need to insert X*4 afterward to be familiar with what's the real difference in the future.