Closed djhcapel closed 10 months ago
Could you further elaborate how the new field would differ from the old field 'O direct naar revisie'?
We discusses this last meeting:
What is actually requested is that we add a new 'track' for when a proposal was revised; aside from short and long. The reasoning being that short/long only applies to the first review. If a proposal was revised, a shorter procedure is (almost) always followed, thus the need for a separate track.
The 'direct naar revisisie' is very different, as that will bounce back the proposal to the applicants for revision immediatly, used when Desiree spots a very obvious issue that should be fixed before the actual review procedure is started. (Missing documents, etc).
We can for now just change the text of the short route option, to 'Korte route of revisie' as revisions will usually also take about two weeks. We should also update the text of 'direct naar revisie' to 'Direct terug naar de aanvrager(nog niet in behandeling)'
An option in case of new revisions is actually missing. Current options are:
O korte (2-weken) route O lange (4-weken) route O direct naar revisie
Could the option 'O revisie' be added?
The present regulations do not mention an assessment deadline; do you need one? Then for the time being, used 2 weeks.