Open Dangabit opened 1 year ago
No details provided by team.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
got 2 prefixes in glossary
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2223S2/pe-interim#4363] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
This is a flaw that is purely cosmetic and does not affect usage, since the duplicate row is exactly the same as the first row and does not mislead/affect using the product at all. This is very similar to a typo issue, but probably of even less severity, since a typo could lead to misunderstanding but ours does not.
Thus, we will accept it as
VeryLow
severity.Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Here, the term "Prefix" is explained twice.