DesmondTo / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Behavior of edit does not that of stated in the User Guide #2

Open DesmondTo opened 2 years ago

DesmondTo commented 2 years ago

Step to reproduce:

Enter the command edit -n Candice r/cook as stated in the UG

Expected: Edit role of Candice is edited to cook

Actual: Getting error telling me that the role cook is not in the list of valid role.

nus-pe-bot commented 2 years ago

Team's Response

Example in UG was outdated, possible input values for roles were specified in the UG. Should be a DocumentationBug instead.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue type

Team chose [type.DocumentationBug] Originally [type.FunctionalityBug]

[x] I disagree

Reason for disagreement:

Based on the CS2103T website, if the behavior is different from UG, although it is because UG is outdated, still consider as functionality bug.

Also, as you can see here, outdated UG is not count as a documentation bug.

:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low] Originally [severity.Medium]

[x] I disagree

Reason for disagreement:

This situation is similar to this question in PE readiness quiz. Should be medium.