Sigla in @wit or @source just cause the label for those sigla to hover over the sigla. It seems preferable to link to the manuscript description or the bibliography, as items in <note> do now. For example, in editorial notes we wrap references to bibliographical items in <ref> with @target. That generates a link to the bibliographical information. The difference in behaviors is likely to cause confusion or irritation.
Sigla in @wit or @source just cause the label for those sigla to hover over the sigla. It seems preferable to link to the manuscript description or the bibliography, as items in
<note>do now. For example, in editorial notes we wrap references to bibliographical items in<ref>with@target. That generates a link to the bibliographical information. The difference in behaviors is likely to cause confusion or irritation.