Closed tobyaharris closed 3 weeks ago
For basic hardware, our ADCs have 8-16 inputs so this is only a code question.
For intermediate hardware, could we reduce the many phases down to 3 by connecting multiple CTs in parallel? If the supplies are at all out of phase, the waveform might get confused. If both are fed from the same distribution board & phase then this should have the same effect as passing both conductors through the same CT. However, this does not feel like a good route to go down and I'd rather have multiple sensing systems and aggregate the data.
Shoestring aims to solve the typical use case. While there is some flexibility in the way solutions could be used, and end users could be creative about this - we shouldn't be designing solutions for edge cases. What are the 20% of features that address 80% of needs.
Can't argue with that. At least there's now a record here that we thought about it for future devs.
Whilst most machines are single phase or 3 phase, some are not.
Some machines have multiple power supplies. Some machines work intricately together in groups so that the whole cell can only be monitored as a single unit.
If someone wants to use a shoestring solution to monitor what they call a machine with 2, 4, 6 or more phases, how can we support this?
A workaround is to consider the different supplies as separate machines and only look at the All dashboards, but once the deployment is scaled then they will need grouping.