codecov[bot]
commented
10 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
fc8abe9) 70.60% compared to head (7e7d120) 70.60%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #304 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 70.60% 70.60% ======================================= Files 30 30 Lines 1432 1432 ======================================= Hits 1011 1011 Misses 421 421 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DurgNomis-drol/mytoyota/pull/304/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Hansen) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/DurgNomis-drol/mytoyota/pull/304/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Hansen) | `70.60% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Simon+Hansen#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Remove what looks like an unnecessary call to the trips endpoint. It looks like I added it but I cant see why!