codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
6ff0a54) 57.79% compared to head (25ff686) 57.85%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #91 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 57.79% 57.85% +0.06% ========================================== Files 68 68 Lines 5324 5332 +8 Branches 1068 1071 +3 ========================================== + Hits 3077 3085 +8 Misses 1937 1937 Partials 310 310 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/EOA-team/eodal/pull/91/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=EOA-team) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/EOA-team/eodal/pull/91/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=EOA-team) | `57.85% <100.00%> (+0.06%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=EOA-team#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This PR addresses and resolves #90:
SceneCollectionreturned from amappercall not only have the same spatial extent but also the same pixel size. This was not necessarily the case before as there was no proper, fixed reference scene used. The problem became evident when reading Sentinel-2 data from different UTM zones. Please note that this is just a technical alignment of grids, we do not check for geolocalisation inaccuracies as we assume the reported geo-referencation to be correct (e.g., from ESA).