Closed JimB40 closed 2 years ago
Especially when it may be better for people do download it if they actually want it, and in doing so, get the current version. i.e. I don't use either, so why do I want the scripts for them included?
Maybe it could be split also - lite/normal and maxi pack... one being like just the stock widgets, sounds, etc, and then the other is more is like LUA and widget overload ;)
Changing my mind :) not much time in terms of Release Candidate deployment date. SD card content should be just reviewied at this stage.
Who's addressing this?
I'm running into some time issues to contribute.there is no hurry either, as the current opentx way is working. Just not optimal.
@JimB40 I will fix all those changes in a Commit today
@JimB40
for #1 what images can be deleted? for #2 what are we trying to maintain backwards compatibility with? OpenTX 2.3?
Update. Sorry misunderstood. Yes folder structure from 2.3 to ensure LUA scripts compatibility among other things
I think it is easier for the common user to have it all in a single place and delete/disable the once he does not want (can we a way to disable widget without delete them?) instead of search and collect widget from different sources? for the advance user it does not matter anyway, I can collect mine, write them, or delete them, it soes not matter. but many times I need to come with the computer to the field, and give a service of updating the widgets/sounds/images for the more technofob fliers
Closing as images were cleared out a fair while ago, and only "current" Lua is currently being distributed. More Lua tools and widgets may be added in the future, but not as yet.
I think we should discuss & agree what we include in terms of *.lua tools in 2.4.0 Release Candidate crossfire.lua is old version of TBS configuring tool as an example