Closed t20100 closed 4 years ago
Thanks!
My thinking generally has been that we don't need a special thing for text that you can already select and copy - it's there for the internal paths because they're broken up by the tree structure, so it's otherwise not easy to copy them. But I guess that's not particularly a reason not to have them.
Yes, I agree, but I couldn't select and copy it (currently on macos with both safari and firefox).
That's bizarre, I see it too. I'm trying to work out what could stop it being selectable
Great thanks! Then this PR would indeed not be needed.
Turns out this is what happens if I copy and paste CSS that contains user-select: none
;-)
Small PR to propose adding a copylink to links.
Downside is that copied path for external link as filename//path is not directly usable. Alternative would be to put a copylink for both filename and path but it is more cluttered.