Closed kbecciv closed 1 year ago
Asked for an update in the linked PR.
@Santhosh-Sellavel When you have a second, do you mind circling back and reviewing the linked PR? @ctkochan22 this one is ready for you as well!
Issue not reproducible during KI retests. (Second week)
@ctkochan22 Can you please jump in to review the linked PR? @Santhosh-Sellavel and @advaitasol9 have a question there so this PR can get merged.
Still awaiting @ctkochan22's review in the linked PR.
Issue not reproducible during KI retests. (Third week)
Yikes, sorry. Slipped through the cracks looking now
Thanks! Also let's get real. I just tested this issue, and like Applause, I can't reproduce any longer. @Santhosh-Sellavel @advaitasol9 can either of you?
I can't reproduce it either, please can you confirm @advaitasol9
let me check @Santhosh-Sellavel.
@JmillsExpensify @ctkochan22 @Santhosh-Sellavel I am still able to reproduce this issue, attaching a video here (with latest main branch). Important: steps to reproduce.
I hope this helps you to reproduce the issue.
I'm trying the same but am unable to reproduce it.
@kbecciv Can you check with the above steps?
@Santhosh-Sellavel Sorry, I don't have Mac to check. Do you want me to check on regular device again?
I still can't reproduce this. Just tried on iOS, Desktop, mWeb (Safari). Also tried with someone that's in a different time zone and wasn't able to reproduce either. I think if the issue occurs randomly, we should focus on the bugs that are approving consistently (though of course, if we do, any Contributors would be paid out).
@kbecciv Please check on regular devices that would be enough, if it occurs only simulator we can ignore that!
I agree with that. While I do think it's helpful to find and fix issues in the simulator, I think for now we have so many bugs in production we should be focused on fixing those.
Issue is no longer reproduced with build 1.2.27.4
Ok with that in mind, I think we should close this issue and pay out C and C+ for their time/work.
That said, an additional consideration is this: What do we want to do with @advaitasol9's PR? Do nothing? cc @Santhosh-Sellavel @ctkochan22 let's make sure we're on the same page for next steps.
Issue not reproducible during KI retests. (Fourth week)
@advaitasol9 Bump to my question in the PR https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/11752#issuecomment-1308201478
If you can help us reproduce it, it'll get the PR moving forward. Otherwise, I think we should close the issue and the PR
@Santhosh-Sellavel thanks for clarifying. I'm still unable to reproduce. I'm not sure why.
Even so, the padding normal 4 out of 5 times. Why is it not normal the 5th time? This PR is not a fix. It just covers up the actual bug.
Hi @ctkochan22, I think it is already established that the issue itself is not consistent, occurs once every 5-6 times and only when recipient time is visible. The difference between a chat with and without recipient time is the top padding that the list has.
This PR suggests and proves that when we follow the same padding as when recipient time is not visible the issue doesn't occur. I don't see how that can be called a coverup.
@ctkochan22 Thoughts on that last comment?
Okay so this only happens to users when the recipient time is visible?
What causes the message to be hidden? And why doesn't it do it every time?
@ctkochan22 the way it happens only on ios when keyboard is open, my guess is it should be an issue internally with Flatlist.
Okay, so it sounds like we should bring this internal and fix it at the root. I'll try and take a look this week
Thanks so much! Heads up @ctkochan22, we may be deprecating FlatList for WishList in the near future, though it's still probably too early with the later to definitely say we should close this issue.
Issue not reproducible during KI retests. (Fifth week)
Hi @JmillsExpensify, what'd be the next steps for me. If anything is required I'm here to help. If not, can we move forward to payment?
@advaitasol9 I believe you need to be hired and your proposal to be accepted and merged.
I know @ctkochan22, I was hired and my proposal was accepted. Based on my pr I feel this issue is being taken internal. This is a unusual situation, that's why I am asking what would be next steps.
@advaitasol9 To clarify my earlier comment, I was saying that we should still resolve this issue despite us looking into FlatList alternatives longer-term. Further, I wanted to re-assure you that if we do take this internal, you will be compensated for whatever work you've done to date.
@ctkochan22 If we are taking this issue internal, as you mention here, are you leading this up? It'd be good to get clarify on next steps.
It was accepted, but after reviewing the PR, I think we agreed that the root issue is not being fixed.
We need to address why its making that jump. So I think the PR and previously accepted proposal is no longer valid
Ok gotcha. I think that's on us then and we owe the contributor for making that mistake. We probably need to take the discussion about the detailed solution to slack. Can you take that on?
Ah, thats good to know, sorry about the confusion @advaitasol9 !
Yeah I can take this on
Ok cool. @advaitasol9 I've unassigned you from this issue and issued payment via Upwork. @Santhosh-Sellavel I think in your case you'll be needed still on the PR review, so I've hired you as is in the Upwork job and we can settle up after this PR gets merged.
@ctkochan22 Let me know when PR is up, thanks!
@ctkochan22 I think you're out for a personal issue, though please update us on the PR when you return. Thanks!
@ctkochan22 Can you circle back today and update us on the PR status?
Was catching up, investigating this bug today and tomorrow
Discussing in Slack as well.
I'm going to unassign Chris, as he's OOO. Going to work on finding a volunteer!
Posted in Slack!
I'm a little confused, it seems like this wasn't reproducible anymore? Or was it that it isn't consistently reproducible?
looks like https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/11752 was closed and looks like we paid out the PR author.
I'll run some tests to see if I can reproduce it at all but if I can't we should just close right?
Actually that's interesting! I can't reproduce this either anymore. Awesome to have a fresh set of eyes. Let's go ahead and close this one out.
Also @Santhosh-Sellavel you are settled up. 🙌🏼
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The previous message should not be hidden
Actual Result:
The previous message becomes partially hidden
Workaround:
Unknown
Platform:
Where is this issue occurring?
Version Number: 1.1.96.0
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Yes
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): any
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/93399543/188025493-15d3a984-ccec-4e20-8706-7deae4c33626.mp4
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:
View all open jobs on GitHub