Closed amyevans closed 1 year ago
Triggered auto assignment to @miljakljajic (Bug
), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.
Platforms
in OP are โ
)@jczekalski please comment on the issue so I can assign you
@amyevans
@amyevans, @miljakljajic, @jczekalski, @aimane-chnaif Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!
Apologies - I have been at EC3 so only just getting to this today. I am OOO reapplying the label so that we can reproduce this - can we get some more detailed reproduction steps for the next BZ member @amyevans - I have tried to reproduce this using your comment above but I'm not able to. Can you break it down step by step for the next person?
I'll assign it to you for now and then can you reapply the label when you've updated the steps? Thank you!
Hey, I've also tried to reproduce it and I didn't manage to do so.
๐ฃ @kowczarz! ๐ฃ Hey, it seems we donโt have your contributor details yet! You'll only have to do this once, and this is how we'll hire you on Upwork. Please follow these steps:
Contributor details
Your Expensify account email: <REPLACE EMAIL HERE>
Upwork Profile Link: <REPLACE LINK HERE>
@aimane-chnaif are you able to clarify reproduction steps for this issue? Otherwise I'm going to close it out. Thanks!
FYI: I'll be OOO tomorrow and Monday.
@amyevans, @jczekalski, @aimane-chnaif Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!
Closing for now due to lack of reproducible steps, we can reopen if needed
@amyevans sorry missed this one. Here's clear reproducible step:
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/96077027/212e466f-79c8-4663-93a0-18afffef70d3
Thanks @aimane-chnaif, I was able to reproduce. @kowczarz I'm going to assign you per previous direction from @jczekalski. Can you confirm you can reproduce now also?
Triggered auto assignment to @mallenexpensify (Bug
), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.
Platforms
in OP are โ
)Reapplied the Bug
label to draft a BZ team member to handle reporter bonus payout (when the time comes).
Yep I managed to reproduce the issue.
I've managed to find the root of the problem, I'm preparing a proposal for it.
@amyevans @mallenexpensify @kowczarz @aimane-chnaif this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to a solution? Let's make sure we're treating this as a top priority. Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks!
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0108aaabc2bc8e4aeb
Current assignee @mallenexpensify is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.
Current assignee @aimane-chnaif is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.
Current assignee @amyevans is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.
@kowczarz any luck with the proposal? Added External
to create the Upwork job.
Users list not showing on split confirm
In (MoneyRequestModal
we are setting state)[https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/main/src/pages/iou/MoneyRequestModal.js#L107-L111], that is acquired from onyx, but we are not setting any dependencies arrays to the local state, so if onyx state changes, the local state doesn't update.
We can add effect that will update the state if report
or personalData
props are updated. That will cause that as soon as users list will be fetched it will cause a re-render and it will be displayed on split confirm.
NA
Proposal looks good. After @amyevans confirms, we can move to PR.
Proposal looks good @kowczarz ๐
@amyevans, @mallenexpensify, @kowczarz, @aimane-chnaif Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!
@amyevans, @mallenexpensify, @kowczarz, @aimane-chnaif Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too...
@amyevans, @mallenexpensify, @kowczarz, @aimane-chnaif 8 days overdue is a lot. Should this be a Weekly issue? If so, feel free to change it!
The PR is awaiting review from @aimane-chnaif ๐
reviewing in an hr
@amyevans, @mallenexpensify, @kowczarz, @aimane-chnaif Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!
@kowczarz and @aimane-chnaif , can you provide an update? Is the issue not reproducible?
@amyevans, @mallenexpensify, @kowczarz, @aimane-chnaif Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!
@amyevans, @mallenexpensify, @kowczarz, @aimane-chnaif Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this?
Thanks @aimane-chnaif , for auditing purpose, if you think you are due payment, can you please provide reasoning and and what amount you believe you're due? Please use 25%, 50% or 100% for determining the amount. Thx
Current assignee @amyevans is eligible for the Engineering assigner, not assigning anyone new.
reason: reviewed & approved proposal, PR created, reviewed PR. I am not sure about %. I will defer to you @mallenexpensify. I think doc is when contributor assigned but agency issue has a bit different process? Also eligible for reporting.
@aimane-chnaif I don't see a ๐ above, are C+ still using those? It makes it easier to find approved proposals.
I think compensation should either be 50 or 100% for C+, @amyevans , since you reviewed the PR, which do you think?
I don't see a ๐ above, are C+ still using those
yes still using. I didn't ๐ here because agency and engineer were assigned already so it was clear who to raise PR and who to review.
@mallenexpensify I think 50 makes sense here (plus the reporter bonus), there was certainly some effort involved but the PR didn't get through full review/testing prior to closing and there was only one proposal to evaluate as opposed to multiple
Thanks @amyevans, @aimane-chnaif , can you please accept the job and reply here once you have? https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01ef8163337d32b284
@aimane-chnaif paid $750, thanks!
If you havenโt already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
This is a follow up issue from https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/17349#issuecomment-1537823597
Action Performed:
http://localhost:8080/split/new/xxx
)Expected Result:
User list is present
Actual Result:
User list is missing
Workaround:
Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: Reproducible in staging?: Reproducible in production?: If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/96077027/212e466f-79c8-4663-93a0-18afffef70d3
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by: @aimane-chnaif Slack conversation:
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit