Closed izarutskaya closed 1 year ago
Based on my calculations, the pull request did not get merged within 3 working days of assignment. Please, check out my computations here:
On to the next one 🚀
Bump @mollfpr to complete the checklist!
@jliexpensify The second PR is still on QA, so the payment date will be change.
@mollfpr is this the other PR? https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/26638
@jliexpensify It's #27408
Cool, just changed the payment date and will check back next week to see how things are going - thanks!
Reviewing
label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".
The solution for this issue has been :rocket: deployed to production :rocket: in version 1.3.71-12 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period :calendar:. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:
If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-09-27. :confetti_ball:
After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
Payment Summary:
@mollfpr bump to complete the checklist, thanks!
[@mollfpr] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: [@mollfpr] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
I couldn't find the offending PR.
[@mollfpr] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
The regression step should be enough.
[@mollfpr] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. [@mollfpr] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
For WorkSpace
For Request Money
Request money
with an invalid phone number (either manual or distance)For Split bill
Paid and job closed!
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The previously added contact should appear as a phone number, without the @expensify.sms termination
Actual Result:
A previously added contact is displayed as a phone number with @expensify.sms at the end
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: v1.3.58-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/115492554/4fc01bef-7aa5-451c-82a0-60e30e1ca24f
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit