Facepunch / sbox-issues

175 stars 12 forks source link

Overhaul sbox.game review process #6484

Open matekdev opened 5 hours ago

matekdev commented 5 hours ago

For?

S&Box

What can't you do?

These tickets are somewhat similar so I'll link them here https://github.com/Facepunch/sbox-issues/issues/6106 https://github.com/Facepunch/sbox-issues/issues/6323

In the long term, the reviewing system should work similarly to how the Steam store works. At least, I feel like that is a good example of a good implementation of reviewing.

How would you like it to work?

The bullet points I outlined at the top.

What have you tried?

...

Additional context

No response

youarereadingthis commented 5 hours ago

I'm not satisfied with the current review system either.

If reviews themselves don't have helpfulness ratings, it's not nearly as clear how those particular opinions reflect the majority. That makes it harder to parse how relevant that feedback is, which really is a polite way of saying they're often not helpful at all.

Being able to reply to reviews is a very good feature for a variety of reasons.

Also, it's very possible for a game to start off with a lot of problems or lack of content/polish and improve in those areas over time, thus receiving a higher rating average in that time period. The opposite is true as well where a game might make some bad/controversial changes later on. Being able to see the average of RECENT reviews is important for that reason.

MrBrax commented 4 hours ago

Agreed, quite annoying with reviews just saying "not working" or confusing criticism, trying to figure out what's actually wrong is hard when you can't reply and ask follow up questions. And if you fix the issue in five minutes, the review author won't ever update the bad review because they don't know it's fixed.