Closed joxerTMD closed 8 years ago
As soon as it's done we can easily implement https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-annotations/issues/95 like this https://github.com/joxerTMD/jackson-datatype-joda/pull/1
Sounds reasonable. One thing I need at this point (unless it's already done -- apologies if so) is the Contributor License Agreement, from here:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/blob/master/contributor-agreement.pdf
which we need to get just once and is good for all Jackson projects.
Easiest way is usually to print it, fill & sign, scan and email to info
at fasterxml dot com.
Looking forward to merging these patches, thank you in advance!
the link above returns 404 error for me :(
@joschi ah sorry, wrong link. Updated -- I have a copy of CLA in multiple repose, put wrong link.
Done. CLA is signed and sent
In order to implement https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-annotations/issues/95 for Joda module i suggest to add new constructor for these classes that accepts the state of formatter. We need this because the current possibility to add new factory methods is limited by constructor's signature. i.e We can't now have two factory methods of formatter like these: JacksonJodaDateFormat.withSomething(Boolean property).