MaterialX importer: Shader inputs precedency

[bowald]

Hi

I have found a case when the MaterialX importer gets a different visual result than MaterialXViewer. However, It's a bit of an edge case and I can't find a precedency in the MaterialX specs for inputs when multiple valid connections exists. So I'm not sure if this should be considered a bug or not.

Consider a MaterialX file containing:

• A Nodegraph with a constant node outputting a green value "0, 1, 0".
• A "free node" outputting a blue value "0, 0, 1".
• A Surfaceshader with a base_color input with a value (red / "1, 0, 0") and connection to both the free node and the nodegraph

Syntax for the input would be: <input name="base_color" type="color3" value="1, 0, 0" nodename="blue" output="green" nodegraph="NG_green" />

This means that we have multiple valid values for the input, but which one to chose?

In MaterialXViewer and OSL, the precedency seems to be: nodegraph > nodename > value I.e the expected base_color will be green

But in this importer it seems like the precedency is value > nodename > nodegraph The base_color is red, and no other nodes are imported.

If I render the attached material in MaterialX I get this output

But when importing it in Blender using the add-on I got this

Where I'm expecting to get an input similar to this:

As stated in the beginning. I'm not sure what the standard says when it comes to precedency, I have asked a question regarding this on the ASWF Slack., so I'm not entirely sure if this is a bug or not. But it can be good to look into as currently RPR have a different result when importing a mtlx file such as the one described.

Tested versions:

• v1.1.6
• v1.1.1

The attached material

<materialx version="1.38">
  <nodegraph name="NG_green">
    <output name="green" type="color3" nodename="green_node" />
    <constant name="green_node" type="color3" nodedef="ND_constant_color3">
      <input name="value" type="color3" value="0, 1, 0" />
    </constant>
  </nodegraph>

  <constant name="blue" type="color3" nodedef="ND_constant_color3">
      <input name="value" type="color3" value="0, 0, 1" />
  </constant>

  <standard_surface name="SR" type="surfaceshader">
    <input name="base_color" type="color3" value="1, 0, 0" nodename="blue" output="green" nodegraph="NG_green" />
  </standard_surface>

  <surfacematerial name="Mat" type="material">
    <input name="surfaceshader" type="surfaceshader" nodename="SR" />
  </surfacematerial>
</materialx>

[bsavery]

Interesting. I think the importer is probably hooking up whatever it finds in order so what should the importer too? Give a warning that multiple connections are there? Or just take the last it finds?

[bowald]

Based on the discussion on ASFW Slack it seems that the current precedence for all the generators (GLSL/OSL/MDL) is confirmed to be nodegraph > nodename > value

That being said, the standard states that input could be value or connection to an output or node. So even if the case above currently is passing validation, it may not be in a future version of MaterialX.

From a MaterialX editor standpoint, I would argue that the current precedency in the generators is quite good. Because the "value" could then be used as a default, but when a user connects an output or a node to that input, it would then be overridden. Since the old value would still be present in MaterialX XML it can then be used again if the connection later would be dropped by the user.

Anyway, we could either:

• Close this issue and wait for a more explicit way when it comes to the standard of handling multiple connections/values for a single input.
• In the MaterialX importer for Blender, handles it the same way as in the generators. I.e nodegraph > nodename > value. (Currently it stops importing the rest of the graph if it finds a value in an input)