Closed RebeccaNielsen closed 4 years ago
@sarahdobson time permitting, can you break out the word doc into consolidated issues by type and section?
I did a quick initial review. Some items can be addressed; other items were addressed in the initial work sessions. I can help point to the reasons from some agency feedback and notes (i.e. moving provisioning was a discussion topic, focusing on enterprise IAM versus CIAM which has different patterns and rules for agencies, etc).
And the long and arduous journey around credential vs authenticators... 👍
I'm not sure what you mean "by type and section." All comments are labeled by section. The GitHub interface is much too time consuming to rekey every comment as a separate entry.
Rebecca
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:04 PM LRL notifications@github.com wrote:
@sarahdobson https://github.com/sarahdobson time permitting, can you break out the word doc into consolidated issues by type and section?
I did a quick initial review. Some items can be addressed; other items were addressed in the initial work sessions. I can help point to the reasons from some agency feedback and notes (i.e. moving provisioning was a discussion topic, focusing on enterprise IAM versus CIAM which has different patterns and rules for agencies, etc).
And the long and arduous journey around credential vs authenticators... 👍
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/GSA/ficam-arch/issues/166#issuecomment-714699105, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANWWTRUUGW4UQWKBAKTJTFDSMB63NANCNFSM4S3KDH2Q .
@RebeccaNielsen - Its for @sarahdobson to break out. Not asking you to.
Not separate entries but so we label by section.
I also have scripts for large files 👍
These comments have been moved to issues #168, #169, and #170.
Attached please find consolidated comments from the Federal PKI Management Authority team.
Comments on arch.idmanagement.gov.docx