GeoNet / help

An issues repo for technical help questions.
6 stars 3 forks source link

SYZ - Strong Motion Vs BB - comparison enquiry #97

Closed salichon closed 2 years ago

salichon commented 2 years ago

SYZ strong motion vs BB station instrumentations show discrepancies over at least a period 2013-2016

1- A first fix was made on the obsidian 8x SM response. (2022) Correction does not explain all in that SYZ case most likely

2- Enquire if more is See ticket geonet 9943

BB ticket Guralp and Q330 2007 to 2021tickets/issues/9722 SM 2006 to 2017 siganl issue: tickets/issues/4739


Ticket 4739 ticket 9722

FYI @SquirrelKnight @elidana

salichon commented 2 years ago

@elidana I @SquirrelKnight @mnaguit

I would dismiss the usage of ANY of the SYZ 200 Hz HN triggered streams after 2013

  1. Period 2013.043 to 2015.437: Triggering process was getting the HH files instead of the HN files hence HH=HN - any strong motion measure is irrelevant Use BN 50 Hz instead Need action and tickets to check that:
    • this feature on the triggered 200Hz is not widespread over the national network for long period of times.
    • to correct and amend the data archive of wrong data set. The reason is unknown: probably data logger configuration
  2. From 2017.05.22 to now the strong motion shows a deteriorated signal at 200 Hz - Strong motion is useless most likely. Need action to Fix and tickets to replace the Strong motion installation.

as a conclusion:

Since 2022 the SM response was corrected for the SM installation from 2017 to now

salichon commented 2 years ago

@elidana I @SquirrelKnight @mnaguit

salichon commented 2 years ago

The SYZ case can be closed- Any doc required ?

salichon commented 2 years ago

case closed - follow up on ticket cool