Closed bjpalmer closed 7 months ago
This looks good to me, but can you try a few more input files to see if the exporter is working correctly. Also, what is the command one needs to use for this feature?
If you are using the powerflow application, just add
<exportPSSE_v34> Filename.raw </exportPSSE_v34>
to the input deck (in the feature/export34 branch). Versions 23 and 33 also work.
I tried the EuropeanOpenModel_v23.raw and TAMU_500_rmsmallgen_v23.raw file in applications/datasets/raw and the voltage and phase angles are the same. The branch values also seem to be good, although it is a bit harder to tell since the export module has a tendency to reorder some of the branches relative to the original input file.
For the European Open Model there are some generators that report a value of Qgen for the v23 run but report zero for the input file created by the PSSE34Export module. This include generators on Buses 836, 956, 2180, 3082, 4572, 6213 and 11312. I don't know if this is anything to be concerned about. Everything else on the generators matches.
Good to merge.
@yliu250 : Can you test whether this branch has all that you need? If this works fine with you then I will merge.
@abhyshr, there were some issues when I tested it with Python wrapper last week. I will further test it next week.
This is currently held up by #189.
Is this ready to merge?
Is this ready to merge?
Not yet Shri, let me test it this week and let you know if it is ready.
I think we are waiting on Yuan to confirm that his problems have been fixed.
Rebased and did one final check to make on 118 bus power flow case to see if file generated from export34 gives same result as original raw file before merging.
Added an export module that should produce v34 formatted PSS/E files. Tested by running powerflow and exporting a v34 file and then using this as input into a powerflow calculation and checked to see if answers are the same.