GuilhermeStracini / hello-world-mongodb-dotnet

📚 A repository to learn MongoDB with .NET
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Add GitHub Actions Build Workflow #10

Closed guibranco closed 1 month ago

guibranco commented 1 month ago

Description


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
build.yml
Add GitHub Actions Build Workflow                                               

.github/workflows/build.yml
  • Added a new GitHub Actions workflow for building the project.
  • Configured the workflow to trigger on pushes to all branches except
    'main'.
  • Included steps for checking out code, setting up .NET, building the
    solution, and running tests.
  • +36/-0   

    Description by Korbit AI

    [!NOTE] This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

    What change is being made?

    Add a GitHub Actions workflow configuration file (build.yml) to automate the build and test process for the repository.

    Why are these changes being made?

    This change introduces continuous integration (CI) to ensure that code pushed to any branch (except main) is automatically built and tested, improving code quality and reducing manual effort. The workflow uses the latest .NET version and includes steps for code checkout, setup, build, and test execution.

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Review changes with SemanticDiff.

    senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

    korbit-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

    My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

    instapr[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Comments:

    pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 1 month ago

    :wave: Hi there!

    Everything looks good!

    Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

    codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

    1. /.github/workflows/build.yml: The on section in the workflow file includes patterns like '**' and '!main'. Using such broad patterns can trigger the workflow unintentionally or exclude important branches like 'main'. It's better to define specific branch names or use the 'branches-ignore' syntax for excluding 'main'.

    Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

    1. /.github/workflows/build.yml: Consider adding more descriptive comments for each step to clarify the purpose of the action being performed.
    2. /.github/workflows/build.yml: Utilize more specific version numbers when setting up .NET, such as '8.0.1' instead of '8.0.x'. This ensures consistency and avoids unexpected results from major version upgrades.
    3. /.github/workflows/build.yml: Consider adding error handling steps after running commands like 'dotnet build' and 'dotnet test' to capture and address any potential failures during these processes.
    coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

    [!CAUTION]

    Review failed

    The pull request is closed.

    Walkthrough

    This change introduces a GitHub Actions workflow for building and testing a .NET project, enhancing the CI/CD process. The workflow is designed to trigger on branch pushes (excluding main) and can also be manually initiated. It features steps for checking out the code, setting up the .NET environment, building the solution, and running tests, all aimed at streamlining development and ensuring quality.

    Changes

    Files Change Summary
    .github/workflows/build.yml Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for .NET project that includes build and test steps, triggered by pushes (excluding main) and manual dispatch. Configured to run on Ubuntu with specific settings for .NET version 8.0.x.

    Sequence Diagram(s)

    sequenceDiagram
        participant Developer
        participant GitHub Actions
        participant .NET Build System
        participant Test Runner
    
        Developer->>GitHub Actions: Push code to branch
        GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Trigger workflow
        GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Checkout code
        GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Setup .NET (8.0.x)
        GitHub Actions->> .NET Build System: Build solution (Debug)
        .NET Build System-->>GitHub Actions: Build complete
        GitHub Actions->>Test Runner: Execute tests (Debug)
        Test Runner-->>GitHub Actions: Tests complete
        GitHub Actions-->>Developer: Workflow finished

    Poem

    🐰 In a world of code, so bright and new,
    A workflow blooms, with tasks to pursue.
    Build and test, like a hop and a skip,
    Ensuring our project won’t lose its grip.
    With CI/CD magic, our bugs take flight,
    Celebrating changes, oh what a delight! 🎉


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Please double check the following review of the pull request:

    Issues counts

    🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
    0 0 0 0 1 1 0

    Changes in the diff

    Identified Issues

    ID Type Details Severity Confidence
    1 💪Best Practices Wildcard branch patterns may be too broad and catch unintended branches 🟠Medium 🟠Medium
    2 📖Readability The dotnet-version should be more specific to ensure consistency 🟡Low 🟡Low

    Issue 1: Wildcard branch patterns may be too broad and catch unintended branches

    Details: The branch patterns '*', '*/*', and '**' are very broad and might trigger the workflow on branches that are not intended to be built. This could lead to unnecessary builds and resource usage.

    File Path: .github/workflows/build.yml Lines: 5-8

    Proposed Fix:

    on:
      push:
        branches:
          - 'feature/*'
          - 'bugfix/*'
          - 'release/*'
          - '!main'
      workflow_dispatch:

    Explanation: This change narrows down the branch patterns to more specific ones like feature/*, bugfix/*, and release/*, which are more likely to be the branches you want to build. Excluding main ensures that the main branch is not built unintentionally.

    Issue 2: The dotnet-version should be more specific to ensure consistency

    Details: Using dotnet-version: '8.0.x' is somewhat broad and could lead to inconsistencies if a new minor version introduces changes that affect the build.

    File Path: .github/workflows/build.yml Lines: 28

    Proposed Fix:

    with:
      dotnet-version: '8.0.0'

    Explanation: Specifying the exact version 8.0.0 ensures that the build environment is consistent and predictable, avoiding potential issues with minor version changes.

    Missing Tests

    Since the changes are related to the CI/CD pipeline configuration, traditional unit or integration tests are not applicable. However, you can validate the workflow by pushing changes to a test branch and observing the workflow execution in GitHub Actions.

    Summary

    The proposed changes introduce a new build workflow for .NET projects using GitHub Actions. The workflow includes steps for checking out the code, setting up .NET, building the solution, and running tests. Two potential issues were identified: overly broad branch patterns and a non-specific .NET version. The suggested fixes aim to improve best practices and readability.

    Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev I'd love to hear your thoughts! React or reply.

    penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve configuration for a CI/CD workflow.
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    ⚡ Possible issues No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Ensure the build step fails the workflow on errors to maintain build integrity ___ **It is advisable to include a step to check for any errors in the build process and fail
    the workflow if any occur, ensuring that only successful builds are processed.** [.github/workflows/build.yml [33]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/10/files#diff-5c3fa597431eda03ac3339ae6bf7f05e1a50d6fc7333679ec38e21b337cb6721R33-R33) ```diff -run: dotnet build -c Debug +run: dotnet build -c Debug || exit 1 ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Ensuring that the build step fails the workflow on errors is critical for maintaining build integrity and preventing the deployment of faulty code, making this a very important suggestion.
    9
    Maintainability
    Use a specific version tag for actions to ensure stability ___ **It is recommended to use a specific version tag for the actions instead of the latest
    version to ensure stability and prevent breaking changes in future updates.** [.github/workflows/build.yml [23]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/10/files#diff-5c3fa597431eda03ac3339ae6bf7f05e1a50d6fc7333679ec38e21b337cb6721R23-R23) ```diff -uses: actions/checkout@v4 +uses: actions/checkout@v2 ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using specific version tags for actions is crucial for maintaining build stability and avoiding unexpected issues due to breaking changes, making this a strong suggestion.
    8
    Best practice
    Limit branch triggers to specific patterns to avoid unintended builds ___ **Consider specifying the exact branches to trigger the workflow instead of using wildcards,
    as this can lead to unintended builds on branches that are not meant to be built.** [.github/workflows/build.yml [6-8]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/10/files#diff-5c3fa597431eda03ac3339ae6bf7f05e1a50d6fc7333679ec38e21b337cb6721R6-R8) ```diff -- '*' -- '*/*' -- '**' +- 'develop' +- 'feature/*' +- 'bugfix/*' ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: While specifying exact branches can improve control over builds, the use of wildcards can be appropriate in some cases. This suggestion addresses a best practice but is not critical.
    7
    Performance
    Add a caching step for dependencies to enhance build performance ___ **Consider adding a step to cache dependencies to improve build performance, especially for
    larger projects.** [.github/workflows/build.yml [21]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/10/files#diff-5c3fa597431eda03ac3339ae6bf7f05e1a50d6fc7333679ec38e21b337cb6721R21-R21) ```diff -# No caching step present +- name: Cache NuGet packages + uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: ~/.nuget/packages + key: ${{ runner.os }}-nuget-${{ hashFiles('**/*.sln') }} + restore-keys: | + ${{ runner.os }}-nuget- ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding a caching step can enhance performance significantly, particularly for larger projects, but it is not essential for all workflows, hence a moderate score.
    6
    github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    12:20AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    12:20AM INF 15 commits scanned.
    12:20AM INF scan completed in 64.6ms
    12:20AM INF no leaks found