guibranco commented 1 month ago

Description

Introduced a pre-commit hook to enforce branch naming conventions.
The hook validates branch names using a specified regex pattern.
If the branch name is invalid, it rejects the commit with an informative message.
Additionally, it restores .NET tools and checks code formatting.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

pre-commit

Implement pre-commit hook for branch validation

.githooks/pre-commit

Added a pre-commit hook script.

Validates branch names against a regex pattern.

Provides a message for invalid branch names.

Runs dotnet tool restore and checks formatting with csharpier.

+16/-0

Description by Korbit AI

[!NOTE] This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

What change is being made?

Add a pre-commit Git hook to enforce branch naming conventions and run code formatting checks.

Why are these changes being made?

To ensure branch names adhere to a specific pattern for better organization and to maintain code quality by running dotnet csharpier formatting checks before commits. This helps in maintaining a consistent codebase and reduces the likelihood of formatting issues.

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Introduced a pre-commit hook that enforces branch naming conventions to enhance project consistency.
- Added automated code formatting checks to maintain code quality during commits.
Chores
- Implemented a script for restoring .NET tools as part of the pre-commit process.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 month ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

korbit-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

instapr[bot] commented 1 month ago

The logic for validating branch names and the additional commands look good. 

A couple of suggestions:
1. It's recommended to add some explanation in the PR description for better context.
2. Confirm if the `dotnet csharpier . --check` command is intended to be run on every commit or if it should be just an optional step.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 1 month ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 1 month ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.githooks/pre-commit
- The script assumes the user has dotnet tool installed, which may not always be the case and could lead to failures in the pre-commit hook if dotnet is not available on the system.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.githooks/pre-commit
- It's a good practice to check if the dotnet tool is installed before running commands that depend on it. Adding a check to verify dotnet presence before executing dotnet tool restore && dotnet csharpier . --check would prevent failures for users without dotnet installed.
- Consider providing instructions or handling the case where the valid_branch_regex or the message needs to be customized or updated by the developer. It could be helpful for future maintainability.
- Instead of a hard exit (exit 1) when the branch name validation fails, consider providing a more descriptive message indicating the reason for the failure and suggestions for actions to fix the issue. This can improve user experience and developer feedback.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!CAUTION]

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This update introduces a pre-commit hook for Git that enforces branch naming conventions and ensures code quality through automated checks. The script validates branch names against a defined regex, allowing only specific prefixes, and integrates a formatting check using csharpier. This not only standardizes branch names but also promotes consistency in code formatting, enhancing the overall development workflow.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
`.githooks/pre-commit`	Added a pre-commit hook to enforce branch naming conventions and run formatting checks.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where codeflowers bloom,
A script now guards us from naming gloom.
With branches neat and formatting bright,
Our code will shine, a delightful sight!
Let's hop to commit with a joyful cheer,
For quality and order are finally here! 🌸✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changes in the diff

🛠️ No changes detected in the diff.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence

Since there are no changes in the diff, there are no issues to address or improvements to suggest. Additionally, no new tests are required as no code has been modified or added.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know your feedback!

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and involve a simple script for branch validation.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Ensure the script is executed with the correct shell by including a shebang ___ It is advisable to add a shebang line to ensure the script runs with the intended shell. [.githooks/pre-commit [1]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/11/files#diff-87320095d7c4f39eed5d8f3866b512eb910e4eec8e7926faaeef6a53ab786fcbR1-R1) ```diff +#!/usr/bin/env bash - ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: The inclusion of a shebang line is crucial for script execution, ensuring it runs in the intended shell environment, which is a best practice.	10
Best practice	Use `printf` instead of `echo` for improved portability in message output ___ Consider using `printf` instead of `echo` for better portability and handling of special characters. [.githooks/pre-commit [12]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/11/files#diff-87320095d7c4f39eed5d8f3866b512eb910e4eec8e7926faaeef6a53ab786fcbR12-R12) ```diff -echo "$message" +printf "%s\n" "$message" ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While using `printf` can improve portability, the current use of `echo` is generally acceptable for simple string output, making this suggestion less critical.	6
Possible issue	Add a check for the availability of the `dotnet` command to prevent runtime errors ___ Consider adding a check to ensure that the `dotnet` command is available before attempting to run it. [.githooks/pre-commit [16]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/11/files#diff-87320095d7c4f39eed5d8f3866b512eb910e4eec8e7926faaeef6a53ab786fcbR16-R16) ```diff +command -v dotnet >/dev/null 2>&1 \|\| { echo "dotnet is not installed. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; } dotnet tool restore && dotnet csharpier . --check ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding a check for the `dotnet` command's availability is important to prevent potential runtime errors, making the script more robust.	8
Possible issue	Improve the regex pattern for branch name validation to ensure it correctly matches valid names ___ Consider using a more specific regex pattern to avoid potential false positives or negatives in branch name validation. [.githooks/pre-commit [6]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/11/files#diff-87320095d7c4f39eed5d8f3866b512eb910e4eec8e7926faaeef6a53ab786fcbR6-R6) ```diff -valid_branch_regex="^(dependabot\|feature\|fix\|docs\|style\|refactor\|perf\|hotfix\|test\|chore\|create)(\/[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+)+$" +valid_branch_regex="^(dependabot\|feature\|fix\|docs\|style\|refactor\|perf\|hotfix\|test\|chore\|create)(\/[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+)$" ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7* Why: The suggestion to improve the regex pattern is valid as it aims to enhance the accuracy of branch name validation, though the original regex already covers many cases.	7

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:21AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:21AM INF 14 commits scanned.
12:21AM INF scan completed in 64.2ms
12:21AM INF no leaks found