Closed guibranco closed 1 month ago
senior-dev-bot[bot]
commented
1 month ago Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR
semanticdiff-com[bot]
commented
1 month ago Review changes with SemanticDiff.
korbit-ai[bot]
commented
1 month ago My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!
pr-code-reviewer[bot]
commented
1 month ago Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.
instapr[bot]
commented
1 month ago Great work adding the Infisical secrets check workflow! I reviewed the PR and everything looks good. Let's merge it. 👍
codara-ai-code-review[bot]
commented
1 month ago Install tools step, the script is trying to run pip install csvkit, which is not a valid command for installing Python packages directly via pip in a bash script. It should use pip install csvkit instead of pip install csvkit.Run scan step might produce unpredictable behavior when running infisical scan --redact -f csv -r secrets-result-raw.csv 2>&1 | tee >(sed -r 's/\x1b\[[0-9;]*m//g' >secrets-result.log) due to potential errors in the output processing and redirection logic, which could lead to data loss or incorrect reports.
coderabbitai[bot]
commented
1 month ago [!WARNING]
Rate limit exceeded
@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review.
How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 992093f054dc6568fd3e1f6558727b1cb6091962 and 7b92e7d279891fee71847bf241703dd2d42272c0.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
gooroo-dev[bot]
commented
1 month ago | 🐞Mistake | 🤪Typo | 🚨Security | 🚀Performance | 💪Best Practices | 📖Readability | ❓Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
workflow_dispatch and pull_request events.ubuntu-latest with specific permissions.| ID | Type | Details | Severity | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 💪Best Practices | Use specific versions for actions to ensure consistency and reliability | 🟠Medium | 🟠Medium |
Details:
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.ymlFix:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
+ uses: actions/checkout@v2.4.0
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v2.2.4
- uses: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.620
+ uses: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.6
- uses: mshick/add-pr-comment@v2
+ uses: mshick/add-pr-comment@v2.0.0Explanation:
actions/checkout, actions/upload-artifact, guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2, and mshick/add-pr-comment to ensure the workflow runs consistently and is not affected by future breaking changes.Since the changes are related to a GitHub Actions workflow, traditional unit tests are not applicable. However, the following steps can be taken to ensure the workflow functions correctly:
Manual Testing:
workflow_dispatch to verify it runs without errors.Mock Testing:
Review Logs:
By following these steps, the functionality and reliability of the new GitHub Actions workflow can be validated.
Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Please add a reaction or reply to let me know your feedback.
penify-dev[bot]
commented
1 month ago | ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 4, because the PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow with multiple steps and conditions, which requires careful examination to ensure all components work as intended and do not introduce any issues. |
| 🧪 Relevant tests | No |
| ⚡ Possible issues | Possible Bug: The workflow may not handle all edge cases, such as failures in the installation of the Infisical CLI or the scanning process. It's important to test these scenarios. |
| Potential Performance Concern: The workflow runs on every pull request, which could lead to longer CI times if the repository has frequent updates. | |
| 🔒 Security concerns | No |
penify-dev[bot]
commented
1 month ago | Category | Suggestion | Score |
| Robustness |
Add error handling to the installation step to improve workflow robustness___ **Consider adding error handling for the installation steps to ensure that the workflowfails gracefully if any of the installations do not succeed.** [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [32]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/8/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R32-R32) ```diff -sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y infisical +sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y infisical || { echo "Infisical installation failed"; exit 1; } ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9Why: Adding error handling improves the robustness of the workflow by ensuring that failures during installation are properly reported and handled. | 9 |
| Error handling |
Enhance the condition to check for file existence before processing___ **It is advisable to check ifsecrets-result-raw.csv exists before attempting to process it to avoid potential errors.** [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [44]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/8/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R44-R44) ```diff -if [[ -s secrets-result-raw.csv ]]; then +if [[ -f secrets-result-raw.csv && -s secrets-result-raw.csv ]]; then ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8Why: Enhancing the condition to check for file existence prevents potential errors, making the workflow more reliable. | 8 |
| Maintainability |
Specify a more stable version for the checkout action to prevent unexpected changes___ **Consider using a more specific version tag for the actions used to ensure consistency andavoid breaking changes in future updates.** [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [21]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/8/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R21-R21) ```diff -uses: actions/checkout@v4 +uses: actions/checkout@v2 ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7Why: Specifying a more stable version for the checkout action helps maintain consistency, though it is a minor improvement compared to error handling. | 7 |
Introduce a cleanup step to remove temporary files after the workflow execution___ **It would be beneficial to add a cleanup step to remove any temporary files created duringthe workflow to keep the environment clean.** [.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [110]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/8/files#diff-ff2c948e92b0fe6b093877c73d2382b7aece339fd6c0e27c4c122299b4b60000R110-R110) ```diff -# No existing cleanup step +- name: Cleanup + run: | + rm -f secrets-result-raw.csv secrets-result.csv secrets-result.md ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6Why: Introducing a cleanup step is a good practice for maintainability, but it is not as critical as the other suggestions. | 6 |
github-actions[bot]
commented
1 month ago Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!
Scan results:
11:51PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:51PM INF 12 commits scanned.
11:51PM INF scan completed in 62.7ms
11:51PM INF no leaks found
Description
Changes walkthrough 📝
infisical-secrets-check.yml
Add Infisical Secrets Check Workflow.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
Description by Korbit AI
Create infisical-secrets-check.yml
This PR introduces a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically scan for secrets in the codebase using Infisical, and report the results back to the pull request.
The addition of this workflow aims to enhance security by ensuring that no sensitive information is inadvertently committed to the repository. The workflow runs on every pull request and manually via
workflow_dispatch, and it generates a detailed report if any secrets are detected. This approach was chosen to automate the detection process and provide immediate feedback to developers, reducing the risk of secret leaks.