Add DeepSource workflow for code quality and coverage analysis

guibranco commented 1 month ago

Description

Introduced a new workflow for DeepSource to analyze code quality and coverage.
The workflow triggers on pushes to the main branch and on pull requests.
It sets up the environment, installs necessary tools, and runs coverage analysis.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

deep-source.yml

Add DeepSource workflow for code analysis and coverage

.github/workflows/deep-source.yml

Created a new GitHub Actions workflow for DeepSource.

Configured the workflow to run on push and pull request events.

Added steps to install the DeepSource scanner and set up .NET.

Included commands to build the project and generate a coverage report.

+33/-0

Description by Korbit AI

[!NOTE] This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

Create deep-source.yml

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow configuration file named deep-source.yml to automate DeepSource coverage reporting on push and pull request events.

The changes are being made to integrate DeepSource for continuous code quality and test coverage analysis. This ensures that every push and pull request to the main branch is automatically analyzed, helping maintain high code quality and identifying potential issues early.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 1 month ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

korbit-ai[bot] commented 1 month ago

My review is in progress :book: - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 1 month ago

:wave: Hi there!

Add a step to authenticate DeepSource before running any analysis.
Ensure proper error handling for the installation and setup steps.
Consider adding notifications for successful or failed analysis results.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

instapr[bot] commented 1 month ago

Feedback:

The PR body is empty.
Created .github/workflows/deep-source.yml with Deep Source configuration.
Configuration includes job for Deep Source Coverage report.
Utilizes DeepSource for scanning and code analysis.
Sets up .NET version 7.0.x for building and testing.
Generates coverage report using Coverlet and DeepSource analyzers.

Overall, the addition of the Deep Source configuration looks good.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 27 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f1698fcc7d659c5fc4f268c5ca27d0fa0c438e2 and 0629c2807eccab9510cd247942878bb344ad0364.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. Additionally, you can add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 1 month ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
- Hardcoding the version for .NET SDK (dotnet-version: '7.0.x') might lead to compatibility issues in the future when newer versions are released. Consider using a more specific version or using the latest stable version.
- The script uses curl to install DeepSource CLI directly from the internet (run: curl https://deepsource.io/cli | sh). This can pose a security risk as it executes code from an external source. It is safer to download and verify the script before executing it.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.github/workflows/deep-source.yml
- When using environment variables like DEEPSOURCE_DSN, it's a good practice to ensure they are properly sanitized to prevent any security vulnerabilities. Consider validating the format of the secret before usage.
- It's recommended to add error handling or validation steps after installing DeepSource scanner (run: curl https://deepsource.io/cli | sh) to gracefully handle any failures during installation.
- Provide more descriptive comments to explain the purpose of each step in the workflow for better readability and maintenance.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	1	0	1	0	0

Changes in the diff

➕ Added a new GitHub Actions workflow file named deep-source.yml to generate DeepSource coverage reports.
🛠️ Configured the workflow to trigger on push to the main branch and on pull_request events.
🛠️ Set up jobs to check out the code, install DeepSource scanner, set up .NET, build the project, and run tests to collect coverage data.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	🚨Security	Using `curl https://deepsource.io/cli \| sh` to install DeepSource scanner	🔴High	🔴High
2	💪Best Practices	Hardcoding the `dotnet-version` as '7.0.x' in the workflow file	🟠Medium	🟠Medium

Issue 1: Using `curl https://deepsource.io/cli | sh` to install DeepSource scanner

Explanation

Using curl to pipe a script directly into sh can be risky as it exposes the system to potential remote code execution if the URL is compromised. This is a security best practice issue.

Code to Address the Issue

- name: Install DeepSource scanner
  run: |
    curl -o deepsource.sh https://deepsource.io/cli
    chmod +x deepsource.sh
    ./deepsource.sh

Explanation of the Fix

The fix downloads the script to a local file, sets the appropriate permissions, and then executes it. This allows for inspection of the script before execution, reducing the risk of remote code execution.

Issue 2: Hardcoding the `dotnet-version` as '7.0.x' in the workflow file

Explanation

Hardcoding the .NET version can lead to maintenance issues if the version needs to be updated. It is better to use a variable or a more flexible approach.

Code to Address the Issue

- name: Setup .NET
  uses: actions/setup-dotnet@v4
  with:
    dotnet-version: ${{ secrets.DOTNET_VERSION }}

Explanation of the Fix

The fix uses a secret to store the .NET version, making it easier to update the version without modifying the workflow file.

Missing Tests

Since the changes are related to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration, there are no specific code changes that require unit tests. However, it is important to ensure that the workflow runs successfully by testing it in a controlled environment or a feature branch before merging into the main branch.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to let me know what you think!

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve setting up a new workflow without complex logic.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	Sensitive information exposure: The use of `${{ secrets.DEEPSOURCE_DSN }}` requires that the secret is properly managed and not exposed in logs or error messages.

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add a check for successful installation of the DeepSource CLI ___ It is advisable to add a step to check if the DeepSource CLI installation was successful before proceeding with the build and analyze steps. [.github/workflows/deep-source.yml [20]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/9/files#diff-dd5be344ce9fee02de9a8b1b1f9308714143f4fb6b708c36f1da39a7f57b149fR20-R20) ```diff -run: curl https://deepsource.io/cli \| sh +run: \| + curl -sSL https://deepsource.io/cli \| sh + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "DeepSource CLI installation failed"; exit 1; fi ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding a check for the successful installation of the DeepSource CLI is crucial to avoid proceeding with subsequent steps if the installation fails, which can lead to misleading results.	9
Possible issue	Add a timeout to the `dotnet test` command to prevent hanging ___ Ensure that the `dotnet test` command includes a timeout to prevent hanging in case of issues during testing. [.github/workflows/deep-source.yml [32]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/9/files#diff-dd5be344ce9fee02de9a8b1b1f9308714143f4fb6b708c36f1da39a7f57b149fR32-R32) ```diff -dotnet test -c Debug --verbosity minimal --no-build --no-restore /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutputFormat="cobertura" +dotnet test -c Debug --verbosity minimal --no-build --no-restore /p:CollectCoverage=true /p:CoverletOutputFormat="cobertura" --timeout 600 ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a timeout to the `dotnet test` command is a good preventive measure to avoid hanging tests, although it may not be critical for all scenarios.	7
Best practice	Specify a version for the DeepSource CLI installation ___ Consider specifying a version for the DeepSource CLI installation to ensure consistent behavior across different runs. [.github/workflows/deep-source.yml [20]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/9/files#diff-dd5be344ce9fee02de9a8b1b1f9308714143f4fb6b708c36f1da39a7f57b149fR20-R20) ```diff -run: curl https://deepsource.io/cli \| sh +run: curl -sSL https://deepsource.io/cli/v0.1.0/install.sh \| sh ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Specifying a version for the DeepSource CLI installation is a good practice to ensure consistent behavior across different runs, which can prevent unexpected issues.	8
Maintainability	Add a cleanup step to remove temporary files after reporting ___ Consider adding a cleanup step to remove any temporary files created during the workflow to maintain a clean environment. [.github/workflows/deep-source.yml [33]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/hello-world-mongodb-dotnet/pull/9/files#diff-dd5be344ce9fee02de9a8b1b1f9308714143f4fb6b708c36f1da39a7f57b149fR33-R33) ```diff -./bin/deepsource report --analyzer test-coverage --key csharp --value-file ./Tests/POCTomlHandling.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml +./bin/deepsource report --analyzer test-coverage --key csharp --value-file ./Tests/POCTomlHandling.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml && rm -f ./Tests/POCTomlHandling.Tests/coverage.cobertura.xml ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding a cleanup step is beneficial for maintainability, but it is not as critical as the other suggestions since it addresses a minor issue related to environment cleanliness.	6

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:09AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:09AM INF 14 commits scanned.
12:09AM INF scan completed in 65.2ms
12:09AM INF no leaks found

GuilhermeStracini / hello-world-mongodb-dotnet