Closed XSLXANDY closed 6 years ago
You are right. I follow the L2 norm experiment setting of other papers.
Thank you very much for your consideration and time. But I'm still wondering why you choose the trace norm rather than F norm. Can you list your reference papers about the L2 norm?
I am not sure I understand your question in the right way. preview works, such as DnCNN, FFDNet are both using L2 norm. I did not do the experiment with F norm in denoising, so I can not say L2 norm is a better choice. There a research discussed the impact of different loss functions in image restoration (Paper). You can also refer to this paper and see whether its helpful to your understanding.
I know what you mean. I appreciate your assistance very much!
Hello, I noticed you used L2 norm instead of F norm in your paper. In the loss function, it seems the variable x and y are matrices because I haven't seen any sum operation. Notably, with regard to vectors, L2 norm is equal to F norm. But for matrix, L2 norm is totally different from F norm. I want to confirm whether you used L2 norm of the matrix because papers often use F norm rather than L2 norm in image denoising. Can you help me? Thanks a lot!